Search for: "In re: Mark Smith" Results 141 - 160 of 1,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2013, 8:28 am by Steve Kalar
When that happens, remember and re-read Dunn – Judge Smith’s analysis and interpretation of Miller v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:11 pm
Ben Challis reports on The 1709 Blog about Drake’s victory in the lawsuit filed by the Estate of James Oscar Smith, case 1:14-cv-02703-WHP. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 5:54 am
What we're losing sight of here is the urgency behind getting this bill passed. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:37 pm
Kock (Syngenta);* a further discussion, this time by Paul England (Herbert Smith), of the recent seismic British case law on the (non)patentability of computer related inventions;* David Fleming (Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione) writing on Re Organon, in which the TTAB ruled that the flavour orange was not registrable as a trade mark for quick-dissolving anti-depressant pills;* an exploration of post-sale confusion doctrine in English and European law by Baker… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:11 pm
Parts of the Neon melted in the resulting fire and skid marks were easily visible. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Pending Trade-marks Act Amendment Will Permit Purging of Records http://t.co/3i2nTQQYDR -> Law Society of British Columbia Rule Change Re: Cloud Computing in the Legal Industry http://t.co/3NSxVPK29X -> New CJEU reference on linking and copyright: is streaming unlawful content an infringement? [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:56 am by Joe Palazzolo
(We’re working on the name. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:59 am
Scott Smith is a man with a mission. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
 Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Smith v.Chanel, Inc., 402 F.2d 562 (9th Cir. 1968), held that someone who’s copied an unpatented article sold under a trademark can use the mark in advertising to identify the copied product, absent misrepresentations or confusion about source or sponsorship. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm by Howard Knopf
The idea is that the cost of re-wrapping or covering over the copyrighted artwork would act as a major disincentive... [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 6:42 pm
" In re The Proctor & Gamble Co. at *2-4 (citations, internal quotation marks, and footnotes omitted). [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
There is no room for speculation, inference or surmise and, obviously, any doubt must be resolved against the charging party.' In re Bose Corp., 91 USPQ2d at 1939 (quoting Smith Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:01 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
 Mark Bennett's series on attorneys who phoned in clemency for a death-row client achieved appropriate levels of scorn. [read post]