Search for: "In re: Sealed Case (PUBLIC OPINION)" Results 141 - 160 of 469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2017, 3:10 pm by andrew
We strongly disagree with the opinion and are weighing how to proceed in the case. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:21 am
These case summaries were provided courtesy of Mark Friedman of the New Jersey State Office of the Public Defender. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 am by Eric
Ironically, Achte/Neunte is one of the cases cited by the magistrate in support of public disclosure. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
According to our opinion, the public interest litigation is an extremely important jurisdiction exercised by the Supreme Court and the High Courts. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 10:36 am
  And when, as here, that's the case, a little public shaming in a published opinion seems appropriate. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:52 am by Steve McConnell
We're not working on that case but we know some people who are. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by Cindy Cohn
FOIA/Government Transparency The Stranger Unsealing Case: The United States government routinely asks courts for electronic surveillance warrants and other orders under seal. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In only 2 of 18 majority opinions did majority cite approvingly to SG arguments—it was Ginsburg. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
Department of Justice publication you can find here. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:22 pm by Florian Mueller
However, if Apple's other arguments against certiorari got traction, then the case-specific arguments could "seal the deal. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
The two-month interval between the first and second Wallace opinions may have been fateful for Ackies’ case. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:42 am
Ginsburg joined.UPDATE:  Both thoughtful opinions in In re Sealed Case, No. 076-3132 (DC Cir. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 12:03 pm
The opinion was, as is usual, issued by a panel of three of the Sixth Circuit judges; my understanding is that the federal government, which was the losing party in the case, is asking the entire Sixth Circuit to rehear this case en banc, i.e., to have all the judges on the Sixth Circuit sit as a panel and re-decide the case. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 8:48 am by Lee E. Berlik
Though Judge Payne did not discuss the element of publication in his opinion, Danjczek should be careful to address it when she re-files her complaint. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 8:48 am by Lee E. Berlik
Though Judge Payne did not discuss the element of publication in his opinion, Danjczek should be careful to address it when she re-files her complaint. [read post]