Search for: "In re Admin. Order No. 8"
Results 141 - 160
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] UKSC 6 (9 February 2011): Supreme Court updates Pinnock (article 8 and council possession) judgment, re order and costs. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
File No. 3-14009, 8/18/10). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:30 am
” GadElKareem quickly re-opened his website at torrent-finder.info. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm
Second, and qualifying the first point significantly, there is nothing to prevent a local authority from re-assessing a resident’s needs as long as this [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:15 am
Control orders: relevance of Article 8 factors to Article 5 SSHD v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:04 am
No. 111-8, § 509(a)(2). [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:38 am
The firms ranked 8-10 are all the same, but for General Corporate the order was Cleary, Kirkland, Weil, instead of as above. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:31 pm
& Admin. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
These remained static until a re-registration occurred in 2008. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
These remained static until a re-registration occurred in 2008. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm
His last conviction was for theft in May 2006, with a custodial sentence of 8 months. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
Rights under the Convention are recognised even though they are not to be found in pre-Human Rights Act common or statute law; so for example private and family life is recognised as a right even though it was not in itself a civil right before the HRA transformed its position (In re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan) [2002] UKHL 10). [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
Order Tonawanda Coke Corp. to Clean Up Multiple Issues. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
Order Tonawanda Coke Corp. to Clean Up Multiple Issues. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:03 am
” (App. 7-8 (citing Martin v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:03 am
” 8/ .... [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:58 pm
(SUF ¶¶ 8-12, 47-55.) [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm
P. 9.146(g)(2)(C);8 ? [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
The upshot of those was that unless and until a possession order was granted, there was very little that could be done as regards re-housing. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Servs, No. 08-441ADEA/Must a plaintiff present direct evidence of discrimination in order to obtain a mixed-motive instruction in a non-Title VII discrimination case? [read post]
