Search for: "In re Answers Corporation Shareholder Litigation" Results 141 - 160 of 290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2010, 10:20 am by William Carleton
, an IP infringement issue, a nasty shareholder problem, a thieving former employee), the very, very last thing you want to do is be automatically "captured" by the litigation department of the firm of the corporate lawyer, even if you love and are loyal to him or her. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Having said that, what’s that old phrase, "You’re not paranoid if they’re really out to get you. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 11:09 pm by Peter Conti-Brown
Besides, this kind of litigation may also be the answer to the problem that plagued the FCIC: invite interested parties to litigate in court against the government, and suddenly we would have an inquiry commission of a whole different--and arguably, more effective--sort. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Michael Sirkin
Target boards are no longer subject to shareholder discipline because the acquirer will buy out the target’s shareholders. [read post]
First, there can be no serious doubt that the rules reflect an expectation that boards will re-examine and in many cases improve their corporate governance policies and practices. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:50 am by Edward M. McNally
The recent decision by the Court of Chancery in In re Celera Shareholders Litigation, Del. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
I deal with those issues in Chapter 8, as discussed below in answer to your question about the "architecture of corporate law. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:48 am by Gene Quinn
I’m an Apple shareholder and want everyone to be wildly successful. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:37 pm
  For example, it is important to know whether the corporation is allowed to keep its books and records outside the state, whether it is required to have a corporate bank account in that state, and whether the corporation is allowed to have its principle place of business outside the state. [7]  A corporate attorney most likely has the expertise to not only think of these questions, but to answer them. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am by Francis Pileggi
Without authority to assert a corporation’s claim, the shareholder in the first case was asserting their own claim to obtain equitable authority to sue. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:08 am by Joe Palazzolo
“You’re not seeing the times that waivers aren’t being granted, because the companies don’t ask when they know the answer will be no. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 6:26 am by Chris Castle
That’s unfortunate, because the Google shareholders (including Google shareholders in Mississippi) could well have benefited from some of the answers that General Hood was trying to extract from Google about Google’s failures to comply with the NPA. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 4:58 pm by Francis Pileggi
Strine’s willingness to skewer fat cats cropped up again yesterday in his opinion in the In re El Paso Corporation Shareholder Litigation case. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Delaware Passes Law Banning Fee-Shifting Bylaws: The Delaware legislature overwhelmingly passed S.B. 75, which prohibits Delaware stock corporations from adopting “loser pays” fee-shifting bylaws and which confirms that Delaware corporations may adopt bylaws designating Delaware courts as the exclusive forum for shareholder litigation. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:39 am
  The answer was the growth of societal structures (markets) providing extra legal enforcement--a lex mercatoria for sovereign debt? [read post]