Search for: "In re Application of Harper"
Results 141 - 160
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It wasn’t until Bill C-34 was re-introduced as Bill C-2 (39-1) in 2007 that the Federal Accountability Act, and the Conflict of Interest Act the following year, turned these principles were turned into statute. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
Summary: This discussion paper is intended to address the following question put forward in the OPC’s consultation paper on online reputation: “Can the right to be forgotten find application in the Canadian context and, if so, how? [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 6:48 pm
That provision states: Each Party shall provide that in civil judicial proceedings concerning the enforcement of intellectual property rights, its judicial authorities shall have the authority to order the infringer to provide, for the purpose of collecting evidence, any information [Option J: in the form as prescribed in its applicable laws and regulations] that the infringer possesses or controls, [Option J: ,where appropriate,] to the right holder or to the judicial… [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Duell OK, now that you’re warmed up, no more softballs. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 11:36 am
. : Carolina Academic Press, c2009.Criminal Procedure(RES)KF9619 .W43Wharton's criminal procedure. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
(IP finance) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Canadian Trademark Blog) (Class 46) (Ars Technica) Global - Patents Managing IP launches Green IP Award (Managing Intellectual Property) Global - Copyright PlayStation 3 video DRM: two strikes and you're out (Ars Technica) Report on the first interdisciplinary research workshop on free culture (Creative Commons) Australia Australia's innovation review - an IP joke (IP Think Tank) Australia considers… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
An application for permission to appeal has been lodged in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am
” Writing for the Seventh Circuit, Judge Easterbrook said, We’re skeptical of Cariou‘s approach, because asking exclusively whether something is “transformative” not only replaces the list in §107 but also could override 17 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
While in most cases it will be a media defendant who wishes to rely on the defence, there is Privy Council authority to the effect that the privilege can be asserted by a non-media defendant (Seaga v Harper [2008] UKPC 9). [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:44 pm
The question comes to the court in the case of Joseph Percoco, who served as the campaign manager for the re-election campaign of then-Gov. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 4:29 pm
I do think that that professionalism embraces the lawyer’s obligations to meet the requirements of the applicable Rules of Professional Responsibility and the Rules Judicial Conduct. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:04 am
Courts fear that if they are unable to assert jurisdiction, the Internet risks becoming a proverbial “Wild West” with no applicable law. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:01 pm
“The Paranoid Style in American Politics,” first published in Harper’s Magazine in 1964, is an essay by the historian Richard J. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:11 pm
Example: Harper & Row. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
On 24 January 2012, HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the case of Singh v Singh. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:00 am
Harper & Row was political speech. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
., a position with which the Copyright Office expressed agreement last week when it denied Garcia’s copyright registration application.)So, the majority continues: if Garcia made an independently copyrightable contribution to a joint work (I think this must mean “work,” because it would seem to be true whether the work is single-authored, joint, or WFH), she can retain a copyright interest in that contribution even if she’s not a joint author. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
Harper, 441 S.W.2d 825, 827 (Tex. 1969)). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
