Search for: "In re C & C Children"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
Further, the decision in R (on the application of S) v YP School (2003) EWCA Civ 1306, (2004) ELR 37 that the appropriate standard in deciding to uphold an exclusion was the criminal one was not robust authority in relation to the requirements of Article 6, and was also inconsistent with House of Lords authority, R(S), B (Children) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof), Re (2008) UKHL 35, (2009) 1 AC 11, and D, Re (2008) UKHL 33, (2008) 1 WLR 1499. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:53 am
Could you delve a bit deeper into the politics behind Bills C-56 and C-59? [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 4:47 pm
Disorderly Conduct is a Class C Misdemeanor in Connecticut. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
S (Children), heard 28 January 2015. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
S (Children), heard 28 January 2015. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:03 pm
(Section 21-2-5 also has subsections (d) & (e), but they're not relevant here.) [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Characteristic phrases have to be present in all compositions in a given Raga; desirably perceivable similarity b/c that’s how the vocalist and audience gets a grip on what they’re hearing. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
S (Children), heard 28 January 2015. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:27 am
S (Children), heard 28 January 2015. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 6:00 pm
Section 2 of P.L. 1991, c. 95 (c. 46:2B-11). [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 5:12 am
Children, Youth &;amp; Families Dep't. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:07 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 8:52 am
Arnold Loewy & Charles Moster, It’s debatable: Penalize Parents Who Ignore Public Health Mandates and Put Children at Risk? [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
§ 636(b)(1)(C). [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
§ 636(b)(1)(C). [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
In the video, it appears he did not recognize that she was the administrator he had requested; “You’re an administrator? [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:11 pm
We're moving from a single letter to more practical guidelines. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
[This point is very clear in Dinwoodie & Janis’ TM casebook.] [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
The FDA has re-classified Topomax from a Pregnancy Category C to Pregnancy Category D drug, indicating there is positive evidence of human fetal risk based on human data but the potential benefits from use of the drug in pregnant women may be acceptable in certain situations despite its risks. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Crawford & Anthony C. [read post]
