Search for: "In re C.J"
Results 141 - 160
of 361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
The most-consulted French-language decision was Financière Transcapitale inc. c. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
SC13-1541 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.220. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
SC13-1541 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.220. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:49 am
Outcome The court of appeals was reversed, and the case was sent back for re-sentencing. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
By Dennis Crouch In re Apple Inc. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:53 pm
In re George A. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 5:06 am
Most of the other changes we fought for were ultimately accepted, but not on the cy pres front.But lately we’re more optimistic. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:17 pm
See also, In re Lockwood, 50 F.3d 966 (Fed. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm
Gulliver and C.J. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
On Monday, Nov. 18, 2013, The Supreme Court denied cert in In re Electronic Privacy Information Center, a direct challenge to the National Security Agency’s (NSA) broad domestic-surveillance programs. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s one more brief that the UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic submitted last few week. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
The students received feedback from C.J. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 2:15 pm
The court agreed with the decision in In re Henebury, 361 B.R. 595 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.2007)(Hyman, C.J.), and held that the court should consider post-petition events in making its determination under section 707(b)(3)(B). [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:24 pm
“[A]fter considering the prima facie evidence but “[b]efore reaching the ultimate conclusion on the issue of obviousness,” the court thoroughly evaluated all evidence of unexpected synergy and commercial success [see In re Cyclobenzaprine, 676 F.3d 1063 (Fed. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:23 pm
Rader, C.J., 1." [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:44 am
., architect C.J. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 10:19 pm
Hence, the Division Bench asked the counsel for the parties to restrict their submissions to the question as to whether Awasthi Construction required re-consideration. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:30 pm
Gulliver and C.J. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:02 pm
C.J. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
