Search for: "In re GRUBER"
Results 141 - 160
of 236
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2015, 8:54 am
The Talk Show with John Gruber – An interview show discussing Apple and technology. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Michael F. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:14 am
This is the tradeoff explained by Jonathan Gruber, a professor at MIT and an “architect” of the ACA, who acknowledged that “if you’re a state and you don’t set up an Exchange, that means your citizens don’t get their tax credits. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:16 am
Matt Landis is an attorney at Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:21 pm
Walt Mossberg of re/code offers advice for customizing an Apple Watch. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
Matt Landis is an attorney at Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:19 am
Matt Landis is an attorney at Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:19 am
Matt Landis is an attorney at Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:05 am
In re Progress Energy S'holder Litig., 2011 NCBC 45 ($550,000); In re PPDI Litigation, 2012 NCBC 33 ($450,000); In re Harris Teeter Merger Litig., 2014 NCBC 44 ($325,000). [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
There is an illuminating piece by Stephen Stromberg in today's Washington Post on the utter disaster that will ensue if those supporting the challenge in Burwell prevail before the Supreme Court re the "state" as distinguished from "federal" exhanges. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Gruber: I honestly didn’t remember making them. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 1:56 pm
When grilled by the congressional panel, Gruber should have quoted Michael Corleone in “The Godfather, Part II”: “Senator [or, in this case, Congressman], we’re both part of the same hypocrisy. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 1:07 pm
We’re located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1480, Los Angeles, California 90028. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:19 am
Will the plaintiffs/appellees (I think they're the appellees) somehow brief the Gruber remarks? [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
They're dead! [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 2:22 pm
What rhymes with Gruber? [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:24 pm
Oh... unless you're right, and we really are stupid. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:13 pm
It might not be enough to convince 5 politically motivated Justices, but at least we'll know we're right. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:30 am
” [Citation needed, as one commenter put it] The closest Krugman comes to acknowledging that a plain-language reading of the statute runs against him is in the following: But if you look at the specific language authorizing those subsidies, it could be taken — by an incredibly hostile reader — to say that they’re available only to Americans using state-run exchanges, not to those using the federal exchanges. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm
” Moreover, only after Gruber made those comments was it revealed that in 2012, Gruber himself told multiple audiences, “If you’re a state and you don’t set up an Exchange, that means your citizens don’t get their tax credits. [read post]
