Search for: "In re Jonathan H."
Results 141 - 160
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
- Preview of Jonathan Cavanaugh v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 11:13 am
See In re Restoring Internet Freedom, 33 FCC Rcd. 311 (2018) ("2018 Order"). [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 3:56 pm
[Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholders convinced the Fifth Circuit to declare the Federal Housing Finance Agency's structure unconstitutional, but they're seeking Supreme Court review nonetheless.] [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:21 pm
Alternative ideas on accountability for protection activities in conflict settings Helene Højfeldt Jakobsen, Returning foreign fighters: The case of Denmark Françoise Bouchet-Saulnier & Jonathan Whittall, An environment conducive to mistakes? [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
With Underground Railroad I approach it similarly, re: issues of verisimilitude. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 1:39 pm
" Legislatures at all levels of government have found that one way to induce more regular legislative engagement and revision of existing statutory programs is through various forms of temporary legislation—legislation that expires, sunsets, or reverts to a particular baseline if not regularly reauthorized or re-approved by the legislature. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 2:26 pm
… Why would you want great health benefits if you’re not going to use them? [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 8:28 am
"If anything would make the court look partisan," she said, "it would be that — one side saying, 'When we're in power, we're going to enlarge the number of judges, so we would have more people who would vote the way we want them to.' " That impairs the idea of an independent judiciary, she said. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:23 am
Border Patrol; Jonathan H. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm
We ask, because we’re jurying one of them. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK A new policy brief by Jonathan Pollack and Jeffrey Bader of the Brookings Institution investigated the potential risks of economic disengagement with China. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:39 am
DiPietro, Chief Technology Officer, United States Secret Service; and Charles H. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:07 pm
Brian H. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Take Payday Lenders and Arbitration as a Textbook Case: What is the Majority Position on Litigation Waiver and Who Got It Right? [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm
Understanding animals Jonathan Losos, the William H. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
On Monday, I participated in a Copyright Office roundtable regarding their long-delayed report on Section 512. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
H/t: JLG The Franklin D. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 11:27 am
Re-reading the debate today reveals how much the debate has changed -- many more now support Epstein's position than did at the time and the focus has turned from "substantive due process" to the scope of the 14th Amendment's Privileges or Immunities clause -- and how much it has stayed the same -- there continues to be disagreement on the political Right over whether to urge judicial engagement or judicial restraint. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 9:38 am
And if we're going to have something of a wall -- and Mexico is not going to pay for it -- wouldn't it be a consolation if the "wall" could pay for itself? [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:13 am
Key Findings Personal saving and investment are necessary for long-term economic growth. [read post]
