Search for: "In re Kevin F." Results 141 - 160 of 424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
Thomas (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, March 9, 2018 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Hedge funds, In re Revlon, In re Trulia, Management, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Unocal v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:51 am by law shucks
We’re a little surprised by that lineup for the portfolio company. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 8:38 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
Before you weep crocodile tears for the Stackhouses, in In re Hudson, 859 F. 2d 1418, 1423 (9th Cir. 1988) the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the BAP&rsquo [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:26 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
That’s part of the reason we’re starting to see securities suits surrounding the IPO, which Kevin LaCroix discusses at length on The D&O Diary. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 7:50 am
[I]f you want to be a significant member of the Mac developer community, you need to have a blog. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
  However, paragraph (f) of Article 31 prevents products produced without the authorisation of the patent owner from being exported in significant quantities. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 12:40 pm
If you're not on the list, leave a comment, or drop me a tweet at @kevinokeefe so we can get you on the list.they're all atwitter (we're not) (David Giacalone @ f/k/a) Everywhere you look, well-known members of the blawgisphere (lawyers who have weblogs) are all atwitter, chirping excitedly about Twitter ...At risk of being called a twit (or a throwback), the f/k/a Gang is pre-emptively opting out. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 7:53 am by Dan Farber
  They’re all subsections of § 102(2), which makes it all the stranger that no one noticed: Subsection C(iii). [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Brunsvold, Brian G., 1938-KF3145 .B78 2012 Intellectual PropertyComparative patent remedies : a legal and economic analysis / Thomas F. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 10:56 pm
  They cited In re Petering, 301 F.2d 676 (CCPA 1962), and In re Schaumann, 572 F.2d 312 (CCPA 1987), to support their argument. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 8:35 am
" In re Anderson, Clayton Shareholders Litig., 519 A.2d 669 (Del. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:04 pm by Tom Goldstein
The announcement of the Supreme Court’s decision largely upholding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on Thursday, June 28 precipitated a genuine media drama. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1. [read post]