Search for: "In re Mark W."
Results 141 - 160
of 2,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 3:22 am
[W]e find that cigars and rum will be encountered by the same consumers under circumstances that could, because of the identity of the marks, give rise to the mistaken belief that they originate from the same source.Applicant argued that the PTO went too far: "Persons that drink rum and smoke wear clothing .... [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:49 am
”http://bit.ly/Ax0rc @MegLG When trade marks go bad: Hells Angels lose bid to have logo items returned http://ow.ly/lltj @cyberlaw More SCO lawsuit news t/c thx to 10th Cir. overturning ’07 ruling re UNIX ownership - http://is.gd/2xY4C @gfiremark Protecting Twitter with T(w)ademarkhttp://bit.ly/QPPr4 That, and some clever things of my own, too. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 2:56 am
In re Keep A Breast Foundation, Serial No. 85316199 (August 7, 2017) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
If you’re looking for more background on the case, you should see the first post of this series. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 3:14 am
In re Striker Brands LLC, Serial No. 87552915 (August 23, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:38 am
In re F.N.B. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Lisa Ramsey: agrees re fanciful or even suggestive marks (Microsoft) & separate analysis of those from what’s not in the dictionary. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:19 am
In re S.C. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 8:26 am
Erik Yacko, Opposition No. 91263787 (March 17, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 3:10 am
"] June 22, 2021 - 2 PM: Robert W. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:24 am
We’re saying that this has made us overlook the effects of TM on innovation, which could be good or bad. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:14 am
” In re Am. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:47 am
Furthermore, the re-sale of branded amplifiers did not qualify as use of the CS mark because such use does not inure to Peavey's benefit. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:25 am
» Und: «Anders wäre zu urteilen, wenn zusätzliche Zeichenelemente wie Wörter oder Bilder direkt einen anderen Sinngehalt des Wortes ‹Bimbo› als den rassistischen nahelegen würden. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:35 am
In re Friedman and Wieder Enterprises Inc., Serial No. 87612654 (May 6, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:15 am
In re Thorley Industries, LLC, Serial No. 90703606 (December 20, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm
by Jeff Sovern Mark W. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:06 am
” In re Jeffrey Butscher, Serial No. 87572095 (January 29, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:58 am
In re FabFitFun, Inc., Serial No. 86847381 (August 23, 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
"The Board observed that "[w]hether a proposed mark is disparaging must be determined from the standpoint of a substantial composite of the referenced group (although not necessarily a majority) in the context of contemporary attitudes. [read post]
