Search for: "In re O. T." Results 141 - 160 of 12,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2012, 12:04 pm
A matéria debatida no RE estaria presente nos artigos 145, 150 e 153 da Constituição Federal. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 11:39 am
When approached for comment, Jonathan Lisus at Lax O’Sullivan Scott Lisus LLP, who represented the Center for Addiction and Mental Health in the case, quickly confirmed his client has agreed to a re-hearing. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:44 am
The O didn't make a peep when Leonard pulled those stunts, and they were all well known -- why the big hubbub now? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:48 am
We can't imagine that the O is going to be hiring new presspeople in the current environment, and so something's got to give. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:36 am
 You get to recover all your fees.Two members of the panel (Judges Bea and O'Scannlain) agree that the text of the statute is clear, so (in a classic move by textualists) don't want to say anything about the statutory purpose. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:21 am by nipper
I doubt any readers of this blog don’t know that the Supreme Court decided In re Bilski on Monday. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:40 am
"But," O'Reilly says, "You're absolutely an honest person, that I said 'I'll try not to do it,' but the milkshake thing just overwhelmed me. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:29 am
We’re of two minds (as we so often are on things) on the current sojourns of Sandra Day O’Connor, which include stints as a guest judge on various federal courts of appeal. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:09 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
They’re still fairly new, so the rules aren’t all that familiar to many taxpayers. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:11 pm
O ministro registrou ainda que, nas informações prestadas pelo município, não há qualquer justificativa de natureza profissional, curricular ou técnica para a nomeação do parente ao cargo de secretário municipal de Educação. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:21 am by Russ Bensing
  When you’re a prosecutor, though, and you’re standing there playing whack-a-mole with Justice Terry O’Donnell and Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor, two normally reliable conservative votes, and you’re the mole, you know you’re in trouble. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
NO-FAULT - TESTIMONY OF RE-PEER REVIEW DOCTOR - GENERALLY ACCEPTED STANDARDS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE - MEDICAL NECESSITY Prime Psychological Servs., P.C. a/a/o James Gajadhar v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:39 am
I don't understand how they could see it that way. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:10 am by Hani Sarji
In House Passes GRAT, Biofuel Limits in Spending Bill (Tax Notes Today, Doc 2010-14832, 2010 TNT 128-2), Chuck O'Toole informs, “[t]he House voted 215-210 to approve the resolution (H. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:00 am by Romano Beitsma
Discussing the case law, including T 0641/00 (Comvik) and T 1227/05 (Infineon), the Board distinguishes two different approaches. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:07 pm by Philip Thomas
For new readers of this blog who aren't familiar with A&O and its principals, you can read the entire history here. [read post]