Search for: "In re P. I. (1989)" Results 141 - 160 of 455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Simon Lester
[its] character”: TheOxford English Dictionary (2nd ed. 1989), at p. 400. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
To confirm in what a muddle is the law, the senior judge Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss P explained the term ‘private’ – as distinct from open court and ‘secret’ or ‘confidential’ – as follows: [19] … I am driven to recall Humpty Dumpty: ‘When I use a word – it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 7:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
Due to the CDPA not defining what a dramatic work is, Snowden J applied Nourse LJ’s definition of a dramatic work (Norowzian v Arks Limited (No 2) [2000] EMLR 67 p 73). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
(Wilson, supra, 28 Cal.4th at p. 817; accord, Sheldon Appel, at p. 885; In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, 650; see also Zamos, supra, 32 Cal.4th at p. 970.). [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:30 am by Michael J. Glennon
In modern times, “[i]nterstate wars are rare” (p. 368). [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 6:58 am by Chris Castle
If you’re even occasionally exposed to contemporary crime movies you’ll have heard of “RICO”. [read post]