Search for: "In re P.L." Results 141 - 160 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
He gets the credit for what follows; we're just the messengers:In July of this year, the House of Representatives passed a bill called the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009 (H.R. 2749). [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 2:37 pm by Patti Spencer
  Justice Klein filed a dissent where he says:   "Although I agree that the majority’s outcome is both logical and preferable in light of the duties required of a trustee/executor, I cannot agree that In re Ehret’s Estate , 235 A.2d 414 (Pa. 1967), has effectively rendered   In re Williamson’s Estate, 82 A.2d 49 (Pa. 1951), and In re Scott’s Estate, 211 A.2d 429 (Pa. 1965), obsolete. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 3:24 am
A marriage is void if the marriage is a common law marriage that wasentered into after January 1, 1958.As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.3. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:50 pm
You need to re-screen periodically and you need a policy to memorialize when you re-screen. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 3:17 am
(F) The relief sought.As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.7.It then must be signed by the Petitioner and verified. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:52 pm
This provision was originally included in Title 49 by AIR 21 (P.L. 106-181) and amended by Vision 100 (P.L. 108-176). [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
Do you think you're entitled to money or might be entitled to money from an estate or trust? [read post]
10 May 2008, 9:15 am
As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.9.Some still persist in using guardianship proceedings in cases of third party custody. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 9:59 am
An excellent story in the New York Times this morning by Nelson Schwartz on P.L. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:18 am
  -- A reader passed along a very good column from the Greenwood Commonwealth newspaper on Friday about P.L. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 9:21 pm
Two noteworthy stories in the Mississippi press: Anita Lee of the Biloxi Sun-Herald takes a look at "Dickie Scruggs' $50 million man: What did P.L. [read post]