Search for: "In re Pohl"
Results 141 - 160
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2013, 9:14 am
Judge Pohl presses the prosecutor a bit. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:35 am
Which means we’re forging ahead with the next witness: Rear Admiral David Woods. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:44 pm
They’re asking for him to turn this into something the facility commander considers a completely unacceptable risk. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm
None of this impresses Judge Pohl. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
She suggested a solution that laid plain the absurdity of some of the rules, asking Admiral Woods if she could send her client a re-typed version of the chapter, signed by her and marked as privileged information. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 1:39 pm
In the al-Nashiri case, after several hours of oral argument and witness testimony over two days, Judge Pohl was still unable to resolve the issue. [read post]
28 May 2014, 9:18 am
In any case, we’re jumping the gun, Lockhart argues. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 9:02 am
We’re in lunch recess until 1300. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:23 am
Judge Pohl asks: is there any written standard operating procedure for bin searches? [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 8:48 am
Anger overtakes the court when Connell again asks about OCA equipment—you’ve already gotten your answer, Judge Pohl says, and you’re stuck with it. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
The settlement provides for a three year consent decree and now enables former employees to apply for re-employment. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:30 am
We’re not the only ones who think that Military Judge Col. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:04 am
Today a judge seemed at least willing to ask the Government what it means: Judge Pohl just asked prosecutor to agree that, even if innocent, the US govt could "take him right back to the cell where he came from. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:39 pm
Second in our re-direct sequence is KSM lawyer David Nevin. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:27 pm
The Special Review Team relies heavily on the rules governing the latter, but we’re concerned here with the former. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
We’re in recess. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:31 am
The prosecution argues that Judge Pohl considered a similar motion in the 9/11 case and found no Williams problem. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 9:59 am
So here, we’re concerned only with information contraband? [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm
But, Judge Pohl presses on, how does counsel in Rosslyn email that document to co-counsel in Boise? [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:58 am
This rule, like so many others, simply didn’t mean what it said.Judge Pohl was no pushover. [read post]
