Search for: "In re Pohl"
Results 141 - 160
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2013, 9:09 am
Judge Pohl again squints. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:31 am
Judge Pohl is skeptical; he doesn’t want to get ahead of the appeals courts. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 12:29 pm
Judge Pohl hasn’t seen this before. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:30 am
But how do you know that, asks Judge Pohl. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:45 am
We’re on a 15 minute recess. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:01 pm
How is the absence of evidence a mitigating factor, Pohl wants to know. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 12:55 pm
Well then, muses Judge Pohl, how do you know about what is commission-relevant there, and what is not? [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:24 am
In any case, we’re in a brief recess until 1 p.m. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:07 am
We’re happy to comply with reasonable regulations, Kammen says. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:01 am
Aaaaaand we’re back. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
We’re eager to know. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:06 am
In re Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:59 am
Miriam Pohl: The Recast of Brussels I – striking the balance between trust and control Roughly two years after the presentation of the Commission’s proposal, the recast of the Brussels I Regulation was adopted on 6 December 2012. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
A word or three more (about Rule 505(h) and (g) arcana, which we’ll mercifully excise), and we’re done. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 12:22 pm
Nothing precludes the guards from re-seizing approved documents, even privileged ones, on whim. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:18 am
“The commission is called to order,” Judge Pohl says. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:24 am
We’re in a quick recess. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:31 am
Judge Pohl says we’ll turn to Lt. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:11 pm
And. . .we’re adjourned until Thursday morning. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:50 pm
Well, then, I guess you’re fine with a prisoner’s execution, provided his lawyer performed in a constitutionally adequate way? [read post]
