Search for: "In re R.C."
Results 141 - 160
of 300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am
R.C. 9.75 effectively proscribes the mandates of the Fannie Lewis Law. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:27 am
While the case law on the subject deals primarily with claimants’ requests for reimbursement of deposition costs, the statute, and judges in numerous orders throughout the state, have interpreted the statute as entitling employers to re-imbursement as well. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
NEORSD further stated on its web site that it will take time to review the court’s decision and establish a plan for reorganizing and re-implementing its stormwater management plan before any fees are assessed against property owners in the future. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 6:52 am
A-4867-15T3 2017 WL 4530879 (Decided October 11, 2017).Capehart & Scatchard, PA - Appellant (Employer)R.C. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
Nor is Blankenship entitled to the protections of In Re C.P., because he is not a juvenile. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:21 pm
(R.C. 2317.421, construed.) [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
IN RE COLEY Petitioner was convicted of failing to update his sex offender registration within five working days of his birthday (former Pen. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:14 am
Merit Decision The issue in this case was whether or not the punitive damages cap codified in R.C. 2315.21(D)(2)(a) applied to the verdict. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
SMITH Defendant-appellant Allen Smith appeals from his conviction after the trial court found him guilty of failure to verify his current residence, in violation of R.C. 2950.06(F). [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:12 am
Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 2505.02 (A)(3) (A proceeding for discovery of privileged matter is a provisional remedy.) [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
Further, in R.C. 2929.03(F), the trial judge must articulate his or her factual findings by issuing a written opinion outlining the independent re-weighing of the relevant factors. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm
Key Statutes R.C. 2953.32 (Eligibility for judicial record sealing) R.C. 2953.36(C) (Offenses of violence cannot be expunged.) [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 121.22 (Open Meetings Act.) [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
The appeals court held that although the traffic stop was made in violation of R.C. 4513.39, it did not violate the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:42 am
” Expectedly, Appellants further contended that “even if the lease was not unenforceable in its entirety, at the very least the trial court should have found the early termination provision to be unconscionable and refused to enforce it under R.C. 5321.14(A) and R.C. 5321.16(B). [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:55 am
How would a re-sentencing benefit the defendant? [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:38 am
The Ohio Court of Appeals (In re T.K. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am
She commented that the legislature could re-define the term equipment safety guard if it disagreed. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:18 am
(R.C. 2305.113(C) bars claims that have not vested within four years of the negligent act. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:53 pm
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967). [read post]
