Search for: "In re Search Warrant for Records From AT&T" Results 141 - 160 of 1,284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2011, 3:54 pm by Steve Graham
” Well my glove compartment is locked so are the trunk in the back And I know my rights so you’re going to need a warrant for that “Aren’t you sharp as a tack, you some type of lawyer or something’? [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:19 am by Susan Brenner
  (If you’re not familiar with the use of "emergency letters" and how the 4thAmendment works, and does not work, in the context of records – cell phone records, utility records, etc. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:32 am by Susan Brenner
All we're concerned about here is whether photographing the presentation was a 4th Amendment search and/or seizure. [read post]
The Court ruled that police aren’t required to obtain a warrant to conduct these types of inspections because they don’t constitute a search under the law. [read post]
The Court ruled that police aren’t required to obtain a warrant to conduct these types of inspections because they don’t constitute a search under the law. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Geofence warrants raise some really interesting Fourth Amendment issues, and we're likely to hear more about those issues. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:38 am by Hayley Tsukayama
Reverse location warrant searches implicate innocent people and have a real impact on people’s lives. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 2:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
The agents acted with warrants that allowed them to seize phones and computers to search for evidence of trafficking in interstate property [apparently related to an investigation into the alleged theft of Ashley Biden's diary -EV]. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:55 pm by Jay Stanley
We haven’t seen the government’s brief yet in Pineda-Moreno, but presumably it will make the same argument here that it has made elsewhere: far from probable cause and a warrant being necessary, it is sufficient that an officer have “reasonable suspicion to believe that the defendant was involved in criminal activity and that evidence bearing on that offense would be found through the search. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 11:49 am by Michael Lowe
Privacy at the Courthouse: FBI Agents Okayed to Record Conversations on County Courthouse Premises Secretly and Without a Warrant This week, a federal judge ruled it is okay for FBI agents to secretly listen to conversations at or near county courthouses and to record those conversation, too WITHOUT ANY NEED FOR A SEARCH WARRANT. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 3:41 pm by Legal Team
Constitution’s Fourth Amendment states: Citizens have a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures Probable cause is needed before a court can issue a search warrant. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 11:12 am
And when you look hard, you have enough for a search warrant, which is fairly minimal. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 5:55 am by Jeremy Saland
In the event a search is done on you and the record is public, your criminal history may reveal the underlying offense as well as the Bench Warrant. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:08 am by Andrew Dat
Email – It’s Fast, Easy, And Now Unprotected From Unlawful Searches Dear Crime Victims: We Don’t Care. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
” The Court re-listed the case a few times, suggesting a possible dissent from denial of certiorari or a summary reversal. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 2:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Respecting the first prong, does a judge normally execute a search warrant or personally search a residence? [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm by Orin Kerr
United States, the Supreme Court will decide whether a warrant is required for the government to obtain historical cell-site records from a customer’s account. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:36 pm by Orin Kerr
Now imagine you're the government, and you want to collect the suspect's evidence. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm by Orin Kerr
Now imagine you’re the government, and you want to collect the suspect’s evidence. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:21 am by NBlack
The defendant moved to suppress the location information, but not the call records, on the grounds that the acquisition of that information constituted a search and thus required a warrant supported by probable cause. [read post]