Search for: "In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001"
Results 141 - 160
of 233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2011, 11:59 am
The US faced two great crises during the first decade of the 21st century: the attacks of September, 2001, and the meltdown of its financial system in September, 2008. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:34 am
On September 11, 2001, I was working for a litigation clinic in New York. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 9:59 pm
The greatest fear I felt on September 11, 2001 was not as a citizen, but as a new father. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 3:31 pm
I will never forget September 11, 2001, probably the worst day in American History, and a day that changed my life forever. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
You see Alkon shares the sensibilities of many who believe we, as a nation, over-reacted to the September 11 attack by overly restricting our rights, handing our freedoms to extremists. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:21 pm
When September 11, 2001, dawned, collective rituals of civic engagement felt like anachronism. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:50 am
There are many heroic stories that emerged from the tragedy of the 9/11 attack. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:36 am
Yet some military commission charges are for conduct, such as the USS Cole attack, which predates September 11, 2001 (9/11). [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:51 am
Add up our first two key national security spending numbers and you’re already at $7.2 trillion since the September 11th attacks. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 9:23 pm
On the night of September 11, 2001, addressing the nation, President Bush first spoke of winning "the war against terrorism. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:27 pm
“Today marks a new milestone in the ongoing efforts to address the health impacts wrought by the September 11th terrorist attacks,” said Mayor Bloomberg. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:03 am
At present, Congress is considering an expansion of the Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) that it passed on September 14, 2001, and that allowed “the use of force against those nations, organizations, or persons [the President] determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided” the attacks of 9/11. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:18 am
Everyone knows that in the United States if you’re a robber caught breaking into someone’s house, you’ll be brought to trial, but if you’re caught breaking into someone else’s country, you’ll be free to take to the lecture circuit, write your memoirs, or become a university professor. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:56 pm
Recapitulating it here – especially given the benefit of 10 years of war-fighting and intelligence we didn’t have when we hurriedly passed the use of force authorization in 2001 – seems an unnecessary, and therefore concerning, fudge.For the record, here’s the text of the current AUMF, followed by the text of the proposed language below.AUMF OF 2001(a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those… [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:01 pm
AUMF OF 2001 (a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons. [read post]
16 May 2011, 2:37 pm
After 9/11, the program seemed ideal to address the suddenly urgent need to track down terrorist targets. [read post]
14 May 2011, 7:24 am
On September 17, 2001, President Bush was asked whether he wanted bin Laden dead. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:16 am
Whereas the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States– (1) found that `[t]argeting travel is at least as powerful a weapon against terrorists as targeting their money’; and (2) recommended that the United States `combine terrorist travel intelligence, operations, and law enforcement in a strategy to intercept terrorist, find terrorist travel facilitators, and constrain terrorist mobility’; Whereas… [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:48 am
Not to the families who worry not only about retaliatory attacks and global ramifications of bin Laden’s assassination, but also about re-victimization by their own neighbors. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:33 pm
The AUMF, as we've noted, authorized the President touse all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001...It seems doubtful in any case that Pakistan consented to this operation. [read post]
