Search for: "In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001" Results 141 - 160 of 233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2016, 12:31 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Meanwhile, French security forces are carrying out terrorist attack simulations in preparation for the 2016 European Championship soccer games. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:06 pm
Army as an intelligence linguist with a top secret SCI security clearance from 1994 to 1998, and was in inactive reserves on September 11, 2001. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
Indeed, as the Ninth Circuit noted, not a single alien from any of the seven countries named in Trump’s order has perpetrated a terrorist attack against the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:34 pm by Benjamin Wittes
For when we uphold the rule of law, governments around the globe are more likely to provide us with intelligence we need to disrupt ongoing plots, they’re more likely to join us in taking swift and decisive action against terrorists, and they’re more likely to turn over suspected terrorists who are plotting to attack us, along with the evidence needed to prosecute them. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:56 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
Recapitulating it here – especially given the benefit of 10 years of war-fighting and intelligence we didn’t have when we hurriedly passed the use of force authorization in 2001 – seems an unnecessary, and therefore concerning, fudge.For the record, here’s the text of the current AUMF, followed by the text of the proposed language below.AUMF OF 2001(a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those… [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:01 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
AUMF OF 2001 (a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 10:11 am by Troy Rosasco
Untold Stories of Female 9/11 Responders and Survivors When news footage aired of the unfolding tragedy on September 11th, 2001, much of the media attention focused on first responders who died in the collapse of the Twin Towers. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:18 am by Lovechilde
Everyone knows that in the United States if you’re a robber caught breaking into someone’s house, you’ll be brought to trial, but if you’re caught breaking into someone else’s country, you’ll be free to take to the lecture circuit, write your memoirs, or become a university professor. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:07 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The case of Ashcroft -v- Iqal involved the aftermath of the 9-11 terrorist attacks in 2001. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 8:01 am by Bryce Klehm
McKenzie and Dory provided early, if incomplete, answers to key questions about the Afghanistan withdrawal: How will the U.S. military ensure that there will not be another terrorist attack emanating from Afghanistan? [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Shreve Ariail
Significantly, information gathered under Section 702 allows the government to uncover and disrupt impending terrorist attacks on U.S. soil. [read post]
9 May 2008, 7:09 am
’ She noted that she was part of a White House briefing in early September 2001, when President Bush was enthusiastic about immigration reform…before the terrorist attacks of 9/11 changed the focus to security alone. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:52 am by Zoe Tillman
Houck – whose past experience includes identifying remains after the 1993 siege of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas and the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 – said that managing expectations and having a lab with a firm foundation in scientific principles and practices would counter outside pressure. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 11:00 am
He defied the pundits and upset the entrenched political order by winning the votes of New Yorkers looking for leadership after the tragic terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:54 am by Milena Sterio
  Congress did authorize the president to use force against those who planned the September 11 attacks in 2001 (2001 AUMF), as well as to use force against Iraq in 2002 (2002 AUMF). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:04 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Janice Rogers Brown’s opinion for the court begins: Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Congress authorized the President “to use all necessary and appropriate force” against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 8:40 am by Amy Howe
After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Kavanaugh’s work came to include a variety of issues related to the country’s response. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 1:36 pm
The Public Record does a good job of explaining John Yoo's role in advising Bush that it's okay to circumvent the 4th Amendment, as far back as October, 2001 and perhaps earlier, to days after the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The most recent department added was the Department of Homeland Security, established in 2002 in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 12:11 pm by Smith Eibeler LLC
After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) tracked the number of bias complaints filed by Arab, Muslim, Middle Eastern, South Asian and Sikh workers in the U.S. and saw a 250% increase in the wake of 9/11. [read post]