Search for: "In the Interest of: R.C." Results 141 - 160 of 395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2018, 6:30 am by ohioemployersinjurylawblog
Verlinger and the insurers were jointly and severally liable to the BWC for its entire subrogation interest. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 6:43 am by MBettman
Strange, 407 U.S. 128 (1972) (“State recoupment laws, notwithstanding the state interests they may serve, need not blight in such discriminatory fashion the hopes of indigents for self-sufficiency and self-respect. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 2901(A)(11) (Definition of “law enforcement officer”) R.C. 2151.421 Reporting Child Abuse or Neglect (G) (“the public children services agency shall investigate . . . each report of child abuse or child neglect . . . . [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:41 am by MBettman
Interviews by social workers like the one that took place here serve important health and safety interests of child victims. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 12:30 pm by MBettman
The juvenile court committed reversible error when it failed to appoint a guardian ad litem to represent Martin’s interest, which is mandatory under the safe harbor law. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:09 am by MBettman
“Absence is Not Acquiescence” The better option under the circumstances presented here would have been to deny the motion to withdraw, and have the lawyer represent his client’s interests as best he could, given his obligation to protect the rights of his client. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:45 am by MBettman
R. 75(B)(2) (“When it is essential to protect the interests of a child, the court may join the child of the parties as a party defendant and appoint a guardian ad litem and legal counsel, if necessary, for the child and tax the costs. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am by MBettman
Sheward, 86 Ohio St. 3d 451 (1999) (Plaintiff may bring an action without satisfying traditional standing requirements in the rare and extraordinary instance where the public interest is at stake; outlining public-right doctrine.) [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 2152.01 (Stating the purpose of juvenile dispositions, which the legislature amended to include “protect[ing] the public interest and safety. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:11 am by MBettman
If a person know the hearing date and doesn’t attend the hearing, that shows a lack of interest in the proceeding. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:58 am by MBettman
Sheward, 86 Ohio St. 3d 451 (1999) (Plaintiff may bring an action without satisfying traditional standing requirements in the rare and extraordinary instance where the public interest is at stake; outlining public-right doctrine.) [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:36 am by MBettman
In doing so, the appeals court found R.C. 2317.43 ambiguous, because the term “apology” may or may not include an admission of fault. [read post]