Search for: "In the Interest of: S.W. (Complete Opinion)" Results 141 - 160 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
Thomas, 441 S.W.2d 841, 847 (Tex. 1969) which contains an interesting dissent. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
Zahn, 823 S.W.2d 18, 22 (Mo.App. 1991).Parties are permitted to introduce extrinsic evidence to impeach a witness by showing his or her inability to perceive the events testified to; prior convictions; or to show bias, prejudice or interest in the proceeding, regardless of whether the subject of the extrinsic evidence is independently material to the case. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:26 am by B.W. Barnett
  I found the opinion long and not particularly interesting. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
 Being in Pennsylvania, for quite some time we’ve had more than a passing interest in this section  of the Third Restatement and its essentially negligence (“reasonableness”)-based theory of product liability. [read post]
21 May 2010, 2:54 am by John Day
  “The rule fashioned by the Cummings court is, in our view, completely acceptable. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm by Bexis
., 33 S.W.3d 805 (Tenn. 2000) (1500 cases dismissed where plaintiffs conceded a uniform discovery date outside the statute of limitations and then lost on tolling), do mass torts end in outright dismissal.But then, you can say the same thing about trials. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Sorrells, 18 S.W. 689, 689 (Tex. 1891) (quotations omitted). [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm by Mike Aylward
” Comment:  Prior to Don’s Building, Texas “trigger” case law was a complete mess, with state and federal courts disputing whether “manifestation” or “exposure” triggers should apply and other courts distinguishing between BI and PD claims. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:32 am by Beck, et al.
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P., ___ S.W.3d ___, 2009 WL 3681868 (Ark. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am by malik11397
OPINION BY: JIM HANNAH OPINION JIM HANNAH, Chief Justice Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
After holding that there was no such regulation, the court said something else of interest: "claims predicated upon the alleged failure to submit PMA Supplements do not seek to enforce any common-law duty. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Pollard, 62 S.W.3d 611, 617 (Mo. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Pollard, 62 S.W.3d 611, 617 (Mo. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Pollard, 62 S.W.3d 611, 617 (Mo. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Pollard, 62 S.W.3d 611, 617 (Mo. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 12:19 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The Real Party in Interest argues that the litigation process has been substantially invoked, because both sides have completed extensive discovery, which goes to the merits of the case. [read post]