Search for: "In the Interest of D. M. (Dissenting Opinion)"
Results 141 - 160
of 711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
And while I'm thinking about Friedman, I'd be remiss if I didn't also link to Why Law Should Lead, a very interesting and critical take on Friedman's book by newbie UTex prawf Justin Driver in the New Republic. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 1:16 pm
These amici include:the National Black Chamber of Commerce (which warns against the risks of African-American businesses being forced out of markets by patent-wielding incumbents);non-governmental organizations Public Knowledge and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), whose joint filing focuses on the majority opinion's holding that the public interest "nearly always" favors patentees seeking injunctions, which has these NGOs greatly concerned;innovation policy… [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 5:53 am
While interesting, there's no reversal for defendant and no dissent. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:57 am
Bush, No. 09-30131 (12-3-10) (M. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
VAIDIK, J., dissents with opinion. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
Rehurek, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
Rehurek, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 2:25 pm
If the Citizens United opinion does in fact overrule Austin, it will be interesting to see what, if any, use the Court will make of this example. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:31 am
J. with its two dissenting opinions, does not exactly clear up the issue. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:19 pm
So that's what I'd do.Anyway, a great -- and interesting -- debate. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
[I'm working on a draft article called When Are Lies Constitutionally Protected? [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm
The Dogs That Didn't Bark Perhaps the most interesting thing about the opinions is what's missing. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:48 am
By contrast, both the lead opinion and the dissenters seem to think there's got to be some evidence justifying a burden on voting, even one that isn't "severe. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:48 am
By contrast, both the lead opinion and the dissenters seem to think there's got to be some evidence justifying a burden on voting, even one that isn't "severe. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
Powell, Jr. and M. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
Madeleine M. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:38 am
I'm sure I'm forgetting some of his recent defense friendly opinions, but to name a few:Crawford v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
The remaining four justices, Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch each filed separate dissenting opinions. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:22 pm
Background It’s a fair bet that you probably go to more interesting parties than I do, but when I’m "putting on the Ritz" I at least like to have the fact of any case I’ll be animatedly discussing nailed down and readily at hand. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Justice Alito (joined by AMK and SGB) penned the lead dissent, masterfully demonstrating that the majority's opinion is on a collision course with the Booker remedial opinion. [read post]
