Search for: "In the Interest of D. M. (Majority Opinion)" Results 141 - 160 of 1,877
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2023, 8:58 am by Andrew Delaney
I do note that the majority says the dissent “strays” and I’m not sure if that’s an intended pun or not. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:16 pm
When I read Justice Black’s opinions, I don’t get the sense of “here’s the guy I’d want to write my appellate brief,” not for a simple criminal or civil matter, nor for a great “public interest” case. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:17 am
Similarly, the majority highlights an interest that often underlies our decisions in respect to speech prohibitions—the market- place of ideas. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The result has been that the public company D&O insurers now generally insist on a separate retention for M&A litigation (usually set as high as $1 million or more), in order to reduce the chance of high frequency deal-related litigation producing significant D&O insurance loss costs. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 11:23 pm by Florian Mueller
Six weeks prior to their May 3 antitrust bench trial in the Northern District of California, plaintiff Epic Games and defendant Apple submitted their tentative witness lists (this post continues below the two documents):21-03-19 Epic Games witness... by Florian Mueller21-03-19 Apple Witness List by Florian MuellerAs expected, Apple CEO Tim Cook and Apple Fellow (and App Store chief, as well as former marketing chief) Phil Schiller will testify extensively, as will, of course, Epic CEO Tim… [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:31 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Some days I don't have it, but I think the majority of them I do.As for my writing itself, I posted mock opinions on cases that were weird or just outrageous. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 11:08 am
(Kikkerland Design Retro alarm clock / handout photo) An interesting opinion, in In the matter of B & G (Eng. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:28 am by Robert Chesney
  I’m interested in focusing on the Article 8 privacy claims, though, so won’t be saying anything further about the others. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
From the majority opinion in the new case, Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:26 am by South Florida Lawyers
The standard of review discrepancy is interesting -- either it's trial court abuse of discretion (majority) or full-on de novo review (dissent).Congrats btw to Judge de la O for the win on appeal (back when he was litigating for a living).Oh shoot -- it's almost 2:30 and I'm late for the afternoon bunker yoga class.Gotta love this time of the year! [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
  Every one of them says they'd vote to reverse if they weren't bound by an en banc opinion from 2001. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:30 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Grits hasn't closely followed the campaign finance case against Tom DeLay overturned this week by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (see the majority opinion), but the concurring and dissenting opinions were especially interesting. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:00 pm by Nate Nead
What is the healthcare industry and its major subsectors? [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by Susan Munro
Gary Rodrigues has an interesting take on the issue of editorial quality. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Florian Mueller
In major U.S. corporations, they have a strategic role and are a sparring partner for management in certain contexts. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Australia In 2019, Noel Hutley SC issued an opinion saying:   “It is increasingly obvious that climate change is and will inevitably affect the economy, and it is increasingly difficult in our view for directors of companies of scale to pretend that climate change will not intersect with the interests of their firms. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:41 pm
Or that, those same Justices, were they all alive today some 32 years later, would still disagree with the majority? [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:36 am by Kevin Goldberg
Nothing in either the majority or the “dissenting” opinion changes that. [read post]