Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 141 - 160 of 5,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
The court held that Rule 430B is not retroactive, id., at 10, based on an extensive analysis of retroactivity and the statute of repose, see id., at 8-12. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:18 am
 The Rule will apparently be amended to specify only that the application to be divided must be pending. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:53 am by Zachary Spilman
 (1) In any case in which the production or admission of records or communications of a victim is a matter in dispute, a party may seek an interlocutory ruling by the military judge. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 6:49 am
As a result, DHS is not required to provide the public with an opportunity to submit comments on the subject matter of this rule. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:42 am
  Briefly, the MIWG brief makes the following points:  (1) the FDA’s ban is an “ambiguous tangle of regulations, nonbinding guidance documents, and severe enforcement practices”; (2) pharmaceutical promotion is First Amendment protected speech under Sorrell v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
”  [3] From the time Congress passed the laws in the early 1930’s, there has been debate over exactly who could be held liable for securities fraud under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:05 am by Thomas Dillickrath and Molly Lorenzi
On March 10, 2020, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona issued a tentative ruling denying Axon Enterprise’s motion for preliminary injunction and dismissing its complaint against the Federal Trade Commission, due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:57 am by Alastair Clarke
In Part 1, I will focus on issues with the current system based on my experiences with the Court over the past 10+ years. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:37 am by Andrew Perlman
[3] Questions of effectiveness and taste in advertising are matters of speculation and subjective judgment. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Kirstin Dvorchak
Mar. 1, 2012), the appeals court reversed the dismissal of foreign hedge funds’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and affirmed the dismissal for failure to state a claim, granting leave to amend. [read post]
16 May 2024, 5:24 am by admin
Environmental clearance certificates would be valid for up to 10 years and could be extended for subsequent 10-year periods. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
The decision G 2/10[4.4.1] The [opponent] argued that the introduction of the disclaimer (vi) into claim 1 infringed A 123(2), especially in view of decision G 2/10 of the EBA. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 7:52 am by admin
”[10] If the sentiment of the Rule Committee’s draft note carries through to the Committee Note that accompanies the amended rule, then perhaps some good will come of this effort. [1] David E. [read post]