Search for: "In the Matter of Decker" Results 141 - 160 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2007, 1:42 pm
Divers were in the water in case anyone fell in - you would last only a matter of minutes in waters of this temperature. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:18 pm by Kyle Krull
  Nowadays baby boomers are finding themselves in the middle of a so-called "triple-decker sandwich. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
  At ACSblog, Annie Decker reviews the oral argument in Williamson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:44 am by Rich Vetstein
Lesson: Get Neighborhood Support Early The lesson here, as with any Boston zoning matter, is to get the support of the abutters and neighbors as early in the process as possible. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm by Steve Hall
Markell's morally courageous decision," said attorney John Deckers. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:27 pm by D. Kappos
  Our participating applications were accelerated by more than a year and examined by responsive, cooperative examiners who were willing to work with us to define patentable subject matter in an expedient manner. [read post]
Decker, 18 Cal. 3d 860 (1977), in which the California Supreme Court concluded: The duty of a government attorney in an eminent domain action, which has been characterized as "a sober inquiry into values, designed to strike a just balance between the economic interests of the public and those of the landowner" (Sacramento etc. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:05 am
Any offering that's the same no matter who buys it. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am by Marie Louise
Psystar (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Astrolabe – The daylight-saving data dispute: Astrolabe v Olson (IPKat) Collins, Patrick – ‘Copyright Trolls’ unite to prevent downfall of BitTorrent lawsuits: Patrick Collins v John Does 1-58 (TorrentFreak) Felton, E Prof – Princeton scientists sue over squelched research (EFF) Viacom – Viacom tells appeals court YouTube profited from infringement, so no Safe… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Minora of the Lackawanna County Common Pleas Court in 2007 in the case of Decker v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:20 pm by Steve Baird
That a mark is relatively weak and that consumers will rely on other matter to distinguish between marks. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm by Greenberg & Bederman
They turn it into a matter of “freedom” and “liberty” when in fact it is simply a matter of economics. [read post]