Search for: "In the Matter of the Children of: A. (J.) T., Mother."
Results 141 - 160
of 365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2007, 12:16 pm
SULLIVAN, J., and ROBB, J., concur.In James F. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:27 am
My father drove a taxi and my mother was a seamstress. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Must law defer to science in matters of parentage? [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm
The source of the abuse the children experienced while in their mother's care, however, is elusive. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:36 am
Father then told N. that because he was undercutting his authority by calling Mother, he could "[j]ust go home. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm
It was held in the case of Matter of J. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:20 pm
The law, particularly the bar, is not an easy environment for a woman, or at any rate for a woman with children. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 2:00 am
Reviewer Richard J. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 6:52 am
It is not uncommon for a father and mother to enter into a child support order and then the parent with primary custody of the child move to another state. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
Father then told N. that because he was undercutting his authority by calling Mother, he could "[j]ust go home. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 8:34 pm
This sum shall not be less than $248.00 per month without further order of this court, and payment to owner shall be retroactive to January 2002 and include arrears no more than $7,000.00; and it is Ordered that the supplemental shelter payment to FAC, owner of premises located at 32 Pine Street, T-5, Riverhead, New York, presently occupied by the family of DR, plaintiff mother of three qualified dependent children, shall be retroactive from January 2003 to the current… [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
" In Re S.T., Donald and Carol T v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
The new statutory presumption didn’t say how much contact should happen, in fact it didn’t even mention ‘contact’, preferring instead the very flexible concept of ‘involvement’, which could embrace direct or indirect contact or even potentially involvement in decision making without any contact at all (i.e. the grant or exercise of PR). [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
Bakers who don’t want to decorate cakes for gay weddings. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:29 pm
Crawford, Davis, and Way Beyond, 15 J. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:33 pm
Vicki J. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:17 am
Consequently, we affirm.NFP civil opinions today (7): In the Matter of the Involuntary Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of S.F. and S.J., Minor Children and their Father Stephen J. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
FAM also recognizes men who are the genetic or gestational parents—but that doesn’t help the Dvash-Banks family. [read post]
