Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. J. S., Child."
Results 141 - 160
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
And a parent may ‘curtail a child's exercise of the constitutional rights . . . [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:41 pm
Section 350--j provides in pertinent part as follows: 1. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:03 am
Once the Family Part issues a predicate order pertaining to the child’s welfare and best interest, the Family Part’s jurisdiction over the matter is effectively ended. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 7:18 pm
The Appellate Division dismissed the Board’s action for child support from AS as to BM given that BM’s father is not AS. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
Den Otter’s recent book and blog post, defending plural marriage, are the latest entries. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In Vitti, the Family Court of Dutchess County (Marlow, J.) made two findings of violation of final order of protection issued to the wife and children against the husband. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Must law defer to science in matters of parentage? [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:03 pm
There are also a considerable stack of briefs filed by family welfare and family equality groups that take up the defense of the child in a same-sex marriage. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
It is well settled that the paramount concern in a custody proceeding arising out of a parental dispute is "the best interest of the child[ren], and what will best promote the child[ren's] welfare and happiness" (Eschbach v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:55 pm
It is long established that for s91(14) orders there need not have been a history of repeated prior unreasonable applications, for that jurisdiction is focused upon the welfare of the child. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:49 am
Following the making of that order the husband, without the wife’s knowledge or consent applied to the Jordanian Embassy and caused the child’s name to be added to the husband’s existing Jordanian passport. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:48 pm
The amended petition in these companion matters alleges inter alia respondent's tendency toward sadistic sexual practice as well as bestiality. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
Complete text of bill is below, but here are the bullet points:Conditions covered - Cancer, AIDS or Parkinson's DiseasePhysician certifies its use.Potency "the specific concentrations of individual cannabinoids that must be present to treat the patient's condition," Limited to a 30-day supply.Dispensaries approved by county commissionFlorida Medical Marijuana - Complete Text of Proposed 2015 LawFlorida Senate - 2015 … [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:37 am
“[J]ust about the worst thing you can do to your fellow freeway drivers: They stayed within the speed limit. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
Co., 443 U.S. 97, 107 (1979) (Rehnquist, J., concurring) (recognizing that juvenile proceedings historically “have been conducted outside of the public’s full gaze … [out of] concern for the welfare of the child…. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm
McFarlane J echoed what he had said in Re W about the importance of parents taking responsibility for their children’s relationship with both parents: at para 59 Re D (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1057, It is they [the parents] who, on those findings, hold the key that might unlock matters for B. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
For example, the cities of Aspen and Boulder and the city and County of Denver each had enacted ordinances which banned discrimination in many transactions and activities, including housing, employment, education, public accommodations, and health and welfare services. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Ultimately, by the 19th century, the slow, relatively stable and case based structures of common law/equity started to experience substantial stress in the face of the Enlightenment’s emphasis on the science of management (of people and things) and the realities of the Industrial Revolution. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
And, indeed, Melissa claimed that the statute could not be used to identify a child’s second mother (or first, for that matter). [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:04 am
The court terminated respondent-mother’s parental rights to all four children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(i), (g), (j), and (k)(iii), and terminated respondent-father’s parental rights to his three children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(ii), (g), and (j). [read post]
