Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. A. M"
Results 141 - 160
of 312
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2016, 10:38 am
Now, before I get back to all this, here is (c): I think this regulation is a bunch of baloney. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm
It is entirely unsurprising the matter was sent to the High Court in those circumstances as the court had decided that M was vulnerable and lacked capacity. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:48 am
It quotes OCR Director Jocelyn Samuels as stating, “This settlement underscores the importance of leadership engagement and why it is so critical for the C-suite to take HIPAA compliance seriously. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 1:04 pm
§2575.2(m) $1,000 per failure $1,087 per failure Sponsor of Cooperative and Small Employer Charity (CSEC) plan Failure to establish or update a funding restoration plan 502(c)(12) $100 per day $100 per day (no change) The civil penalty increase provides yet another reason for employer and other plan sponsors,. fiduciaries and administrators to strive to prevent ERISA violations. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
Deer, C. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:42 am
An excerpt: Kristina C., the mother of five-year-old Alissa M. and two-year-old K.C., appeals the juvenile court‟s September 29, 2105 order terminating her parental rights and identifying adoption as the permanent plan for her two daughters. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Merges & Nelson on patent scope, Burk & Lemley on policy levers—if you read these side by side, you see M&N say patents are unsuited to software b/c corporate capital isn’t involved and it’s individual; B&L 20 years later say that patents are perfectly suited—b/c institutions have changed, everything else has changed in terms of economic analysis, policy analysis. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
If it’s b/c they go too close to other areas like patent, then alternatives might matter. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 1:37 pm
I must, as a matter of law and as set out above, weigh public policy concerns against the welfare of these particular children. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
Posted by Martin C. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:03 pm
Klass: before contracting, your duty is not to misrepresent; you don’t have to look out for the welfare of the other party. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
They are the daughters and surviving heirs of Elizabeth M. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:38 am
Now, before I get back to all this, here is (c): I think this regulation is a bunch of baloney. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
’ (Welfare and Institutions Code section § 730, subd. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 8:10 pm
W is for Welfare Benefits. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 8:58 am
Does it matter for its own sake, or just instrumentally to some other aim, such as maximizing welfare? [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am
Session 3: Licensing IModerator: Yonathan ArbelJonathan M. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:56 am
The problem occurs b/c of financial/tax issues, but as a property professor I’m concerned with parity for the treatment of non-probate and probate assets. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm
There was also guidance issued in relation to the approval of consent orders – judges were reminded care was needed even when parties appeared to have agreed matters. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
The future of grandparent visitation cases will remain interesting, I’m sure [read post]
