Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: S. J. J." Results 141 - 160 of 733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 12:55 pm by familoo
It was suggested that because the facts underlying the alleged civil fraud had been determined by Mostyn J within the family proceedings (adversely to H) it was a contempt to pursue the matter again elsewhere and that the court’s Hadkinson jurisdiction should be invoked to prohibit it. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:09 am by familoo
The court, therefore, does not have to consider s.4 of the Adoption and Children Act. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
“The Paranoid Style in American Politics,” first published in Harper’s Magazine in 1964, is an essay by the historian Richard J. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm by familoo
Broadly: divorce, civil partnership and financial matters are not 'relevant family proceedings'. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:13 pm by J
Without more detail, it’s hard to know what that might involve. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:13 pm by J
Without more detail, it’s hard to know what that might involve. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:15 am by Alasdair Henderson
The burden is always on the State to show that an incapacitated person’s welfare cannot be sustained by living with and being looked after by his or her family, with or without outside support. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 1:54 pm
These findings were importan because they established s.7 as substantive rights beyond produral rights of due process and beyond the intent of drafters of the Charter. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
  Welfare for the rich is apparently fine and dandy under Rick Santorum's version of morality. [read post]