Search for: "Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs"
Results 141 - 160
of 496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2018, 7:23 am
These investors included Plaintiff-Petitioners Cynthia Boyd and Thomas Flanders (“Investors”). [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 10:36 pm
In the Pepper case, the Supreme Court basically sidestepped the Illinois Brick doctrine regarding indirect purchasers' antitrust standing by holding that consumers are direct purchasers from Apple, also paving the way for the Pistacchio complaint:"When [Pistacchio] and the Class purchased Apple Arcade, they did so directly through the App Store and paid Apple directly, using their credit card or other payment sources. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 4:22 am
Antitrust Class Action Complaint Failed to Adequately Establish Antitrust Injury thus Warranting Dismissal of Certain Antitrust Claims in Class Action Complaint for Lack of Standing California Federal Holds Plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit against various defendants for allegedly conspiring to artificially inflate and fix the prices of dynamic random access memory (DRAM) in the market: plaintiffs are indirect purchasers of DRAM, and filed the class… [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:06 am
The result is that both direct and indirect purchasers can sue to recover losses. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
The appellate court rejected an argument advanced by objectors to the settlement that certification of a nationwide settlement class was improper based on differences in state law with respect to indirect purchaser standing. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:37 am
The settlement provided for a fund of $295 million to be distributed to both the direct and indirect purchasers: the direct purchasers were to receive $22.5 million of the fund, while the indirect purchasers would receive $272.5 million. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:10 pm
Indirect purchasers may sue under federal law for injunctive relief. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm
The rationale of McCarthy, as explained by Hale, is that defendants would be exposed to multiple liability from both direct and indirect purchasers if indirect purchasers had standing to sue for overcharges. 2009 U.S. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:30 am
” With this backdrop, the indirect CIPRO purchaser plaintiffs in In re: Cipro Cases I & II have appealed Judge Strauss’ decision to the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District (Division I). [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:13 am
Generally, these were understood to involve “purchasing” and “territory” in exchange for permission to use the name “Milano Pizza” or “Milano Pizzeria. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
the error we identify arises from the ambiguity in the class notice because it creates a real possibility that indirect purchasers who erroneously conclude they are not members of the plaintiff class may never be heard from and the judgment will be res judicata on their claims. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:24 am
To certify a class on behalf of all investors who purchased shares during the class period, plaintiffs usually invoke a presumption of reliance created by the Court in the Basic case. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
The act excludes copies that are purchased: once a copy is bought, you may display it where the public can see it. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
Nor have they argued that the law imposes a duty on the plaintiffs to offer health insurance plans. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 11:15 pm
Its petition argues that Judge Koh shouldn't have applied California law to this decision since two dozen other states don't allow indirect purchaser claims on antitrust grounds; it also takes aim at the consumer plaintiffs' damages model; and argues that "large numbers of consumers" are included in the class definition but, in Qualcomm's view, "suffered no antitrust impact. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 8:53 pm
Under the terms of the proposed settlements, Cadbury will pay $1.3 million into a fund that will be used to pay expenses of the direct purchaser plaintiffs, $250,000 to be paid to indirect purchasers for resale, and $250,000 to be used to pay for class notice and administration. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 7:52 am
The second question asks what evidence must be put forth by a plaintiff seeking to rebut the presumption (Barclays PLC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:35 am
Under those laws, a plaintiff may not recover for an “indirect” or “derivative” injury; that is, “when the loss arises solely as a result of injuries sustained by another party. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:02 pm
Defendants claim that plaintiffs' damages experts failed to distinguish between transactions in which plaintiffs were "first purchasers" of copper and indirect purchases by plaintiffs that cannot provide a basis for recovery under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:49 pm
When the child becomes adult, custody and control by a disabled contributor is at an end, as is the contributor's indirect benefit. [read post]
