Search for: "Integrity Trust Co. v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
  The first was statutory law—we considered the culture of statutory law making in the United States as more inclined toward statutory complication rather than to integrated legal code development. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Just six days after our article, Luis Aguilar, a Commissioner of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), stated very clearly in a speech entitled “Cyber Risks in the Boardroom,”[ii] that,   [B]oards must take seriously their responsibility to ensure that management has implemented effective risk management protocols. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It is the state’s interest in the child’s welfare and the integrity of the family that must be protected, especially when a non-biological parent and child lived together for years and developed a true familial relationship. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
If we ask why people might believe that government is responsive to public opinion, the only plausible answer is that they trust elections to produce officials who are responsive to public opinion. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States 13-457Issue: Whether the Secretary of State’s issuance of a passport based on a determination of a person’s United States citizenship is conclusive proof of the passport holder’s citizenship such that it may not be collaterally attacked. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  J.L.S. opposed DCF’s motion on the grounds that she did not intend Marotta to be a father and that “introducing a virtual stranger into the family unit would violate the right to family integrity. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The PDA: The Early Years The PDA was enacted to reverse the Supreme Court’s 1976 ruling in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In this respect, the evidence upon which a decision could be made was greater than the evidence that Prakash J. dealt with in SM Integrated Transware Ltd v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
   If the United States government can encrypt its data, so can China, or the Russian mob, or a Mexican drug cartel. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:15 am by Susan Brenner
Kessler, supra (quoting Western Electric Co. v. [read post]