Search for: "Irons v. Superior Court" Results 141 - 160 of 307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 1, 13 [CEQA petitioners, as the parties “with the most to gain from any underinclusion,” bear “the burden of showing prejudice from any overinclusion of materials into the administrative record”]; Stockton Citizens For Sensible Planning v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:23 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court responds: Nor does [the complaint] allege that the Gawker employees who allegedly posted comments did so within the scope of their employment, which is a required element of a respondeat superior claim in Illinois. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
Another way to categorize is to emphasize proceedings commonly heard in the Provincial Court instead of the Superior Court of Justice.[6] Naturally, there is considerable overlap in the concepts identified below to all levels of court but it is the purpose of this paper to illustrate how the most common forms of wrongful convictions and the reasons thereof are crystallised most at levels short of high-profile offences. 2. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
Another way to categorize is to emphasize proceedings commonly heard in the Provincial Court instead of the Superior Court of Justice.[6] Naturally, there is considerable overlap in the concepts identified below to all levels of court but it is the purpose of this paper to illustrate how the most common forms of wrongful convictions and the reasons thereof are crystallised most at levels short of high-profile offences. 2. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
  The Supreme Court reversed, holding that a subordinate of a government employee may refuse to comply with a subpoena relating to his work “on the ground that the subordinate is prohibited from making such submission by his superior. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
A: Copyright laws differ between jurisdictions, but commentators often overstate the scope of the opinion by the Court of Justice of the EU in SAS Institute v. [read post]