Search for: "Israel v. United States et al"
Results 141 - 160
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133, (June 20, 2013). [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm
International Business Machines, et. al. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media… [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
As of 1789, most indigenous people within the boundaries of the United States lived in non-State territories claimed by the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
(Excess Copyright) Why Buy American has nothing to do with Canadian copyright reform (Blayne Haggart’s Orangespace) Additional evidence and relevant dates on trade mark appeals: Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc v Wise Gourmet, Inc (Canadian Trademark Blog) Denmark Use of Skoda as a keyword: infringement issue ‘unclear’, says Danish Court (Class 46) ‘Global’ infringer sent to jail (Class 46) Europe Europe moves toward European patents and European… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Khan v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Spicy IP) Global credit crisis leads to boom times for legal process outsourcing businesses specialising in IP (Spicy IP) Israel Israeli bakery Matzot Aviv files trade mark infringement suit against rival Patisserie Aviv and US importer Bagel Bites (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office relaxes conditions for modified examination (The IP Factor) Italy Italian Supreme Court recognises ‘post sale confusion’ in criminal proceedings concerning… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
INVENTIO AG et al. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Fossil, Inc. et al (Docket Report) CAFC: Liability for offers to sell clarified: Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Research in Motion Ltd., et. al. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
Motion Picture Theatre Associations of Canada, et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
(IP Osgoode) United States US General IP outsourcing threatens national interest? [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
