Search for: "JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC" Results 141 - 160 of 860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2019, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Cornerstone Therapeutics, Inc., 720 F.3d 490 (2d Cir. 2013) and Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 299 F.3d 1242 (11th Cir. 2002), to argue that a false advertising claim cannot be premised on matters about which there is legitimate ongoing “scientific disagreement. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:00 am by Andrew B. Lustigman
The National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (“NAD”) recently recommended that Bayer Healthcare LLC (“Bayer” or the “advertiser”) discontinue particular comparative superiority claims for Aleve, including “Proven Better on Pain than Tylenol,” following a challenge by Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., maker of Tylenol products. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Mead Johnson was inapposite. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:46 am by Richard Hunt
Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20, 111 S.Ct. 1647 (1991). [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
House Bill 5278A and Senate Bill 251A set the economic nexus threshold at $100,000 in sales or 200 transactions.[15] Tennessee House Bill 667 requires remote sellers to collect the state’s sales tax if they have more than $500,000 of sales into Tennessee.[16] Virginia As of July 1, remote sellers and marketplace providers are required to collect Virginia’s sales tax if they have more than $100,000 in sales or at least 200 transactions in Virginia.[17] West Virginia House Bill 2813… [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:32 am by Kevin Kaufman
In addition to state-level sales taxes, consumers also face local sales taxes in 38 states. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:15 am
" See In re Pitney Bowes, Inc., 125 U.S.P.Q.2d 1417, 1420 (T.T.A.B. 2018); In re DSM Pharms., Inc., 87 U.S.P.Q.2d 1623, 1626 (T.T.A.B. 2008). [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
There are things that consumers on their own had perceptions -- for whatever reason -- that there were ingredients they preferred not to consume if they didn’t have to. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
   The latest iteration of the Restatement of the Law of Consumer Contracts (draft) aspires to summarize majority common-law rules and trends based on “all” relevant cases in a particular area of (consumer) law.Link to -- > Tentative Draft dated April 18, 2019 But what is a relevant case? [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
The trial court judge can then adjust the product of this calculation based on factors not already reflected in the hourly rate and the number of hours.It remains to be seen it this new SCOTX precedent will have any impact on debt collection litigation against consumers. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Deception doesn’t even need to be the most likely outcome for a given target consumer as long as a substantial number of consumers are likely to be deceived. [read post]