Search for: "JONES v. BLACK" Results 141 - 160 of 574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
An American’s Guide to the GDPR, Denver Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 1, 2020, Meg Leta Jones, Georgetown University – Communication, Culture, and Technology, Margot E. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am by Ashoka Mukpo
., June 1, 2020.Derek BakerIn the wake of George Floyd’s death, Americans poured into the streets to voice their condemnation of police brutality against Black people. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Global Legal Chronicle reports on a decision of Master Cook to permit service of libel proceedings brought by intelligence  agency Black Cube against an Israeli broadcaster. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Taking a Side: The Case for Neutral Reportage, Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 20/2020, Tamsin Black, Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  They narrate the story—in which the Cherokee Nation’s startling victory in Worcester v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:00 am by Daniel Tilley
 On April 27, we are going to court to put an end to SB 7066 for good.In this case, Jones v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Kalvis Golde
Louis Jones, a black soldier who kidnapped, raped and murdered a white female soldier, was sentenced to death under federal law in November of 1995. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:20 am by Phil Dixon
Alford Jones, 290 N.C. 292, 225 S.E.2d 549 (1976) (intervening negligence in treatment no excuse). [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Justice Hugo Black emphasized the text and what he said were the original understandings, but his view was not accepted by the Warren Court as a whole. [read post]