Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
The petitioners in the patent-infringement case Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
  Promising news for the petitioner in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
Elsewhere in tax discrimination news, Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
  He formerly was associated with Judicial Watch, Inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:01 am by Bexis
Va. 1999) (“medical examinations [are]reasonably necessary”; “procedures exist which make the early detection and treatment of the disease possible and beneficial”); Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
§ 7607(d)(7)(B); (2) whether the court’s imposition of its own detailed methodology for implementing the Good Neighbor provision violated foundational principles governing judicial review of administrative decision-making; and (3) whether an upwind state that is polluting a downwind state is free of any obligations under the Good Neighbor provision unless and until EPA has quantified the upwind state’s contribution to downwind… [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:03 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 14-page unanimous per curiam ruling this week by a three-member panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Department of Defense to release graphic photos of the slain Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.In a 29-page Memorandum of Decision last year in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (5th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Reply of petitioners Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm by John Steele
[11]      In relation to subrule 43(ix), where he addressed the words “any other relevant matter(s)” set out in rule 13.1.02.(2)(b)(ix), he stated the following:  Other factors:  Relying upon Oliver v Gothard, counsel for the plaintiff asserts that it is conducive to the appearance of fairness for all parties that an action take place in another location in circumstances where fairness or corruption of a judicial system in a… [read post]