Search for: "James v. Rogers"
Results 141 - 160
of 624
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2019, 3:10 am
” Briefly: At Newsweek Roger Parloff reports that to decide Google LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court ruled that judges rather than juries should determine whether or not pharmaceutical product liability claims may proceed under the “clear evidence” standard established in Wyeth v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation James Ball has a piece on Journalism.co.uk entitled “The hidden threats in taming tech by law”. [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:03 am
James N. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Flynn, James P. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
Such a definition, be it heuristic or conceptual, has been accepted by at least some philosophers (see James Nickel, ‘Is there a Human Right to Employment? [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Malpractice and Tort Law Marc Ginsberg, The John Marshall Law School (Chicago), Cross-Disciplinary Expert Testimony In Medical Negligence Litigation Mark Hall, Wake Forest University, The Restatement (Third) of Medical Liability Michelle Mello, Stanford University, Practice Changes Among Medical Malpractice "Frequent Flyers" Alix Rogers, Stanford Law School, Neither Property Nor Tort: The Curious Case of Quasi-Property of Human Bodily Remains D. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Northern Ireland Republic of Ireland footballer James McClean is to receive damages from a Belfast councillor who defamed him on a popular radio programme. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
At CNN, Ariane de Vogue catches up with James Dimaya, who won a significant victory last term when the Supreme Court ruled in Sessions v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
Dixon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
… Major Philosophers rarely or never cited Heraclitus, Parmenides, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Protagoras, Epicurus, Zeno of Citium, Plotinus, Epictetus, Gregory the Great, John the Scot, Avicenna, Averroes, Roger Bacon, John Calvin, Baruch Spinoza, George Berkeley, Henri Bergson, Alfred North Whitehead and Søren Kierkegaard, all named in that earlier list of major philosophers, fill that bill. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:22 pm
Supreme Court’s 1857 Dred Scott v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, as articulated in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Miner v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am
Ryan Gabrielson ProPublica Originally published at ProPublica January 17 , 2019 At the FBI Laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, a team of about a half-dozen technicians analyzes pictures down to their pixels, trying to determine if the faces, hands, clothes or cars of suspects match images collected by investigators from cameras at crime scenes. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 11:16 am
In a six-day trial, Jason Wong represented a Bell Canada store manager to fight her termination: Hussey v Bell Canada, 2019 CanLII 883 (CA LA). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 3:01 am
“An important win for property owners”: Supreme Court rules 8-0 that protected species habitat doesn’t include tracts containing no actual dusty gopher frogs and not inhabitable by them absent modification [Roger Pilon, George Will, earlier on Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
