Search for: "Jane Doe v State of New York"
Results 141 - 160
of 250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2016, 4:24 am
Does anyone have information on Jane Expert? [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 4:51 am
As the Hulk v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
They argue that the bill does not provide adequate safeguards for journalists and their sources from state surveillance. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:54 am
At ThinkProgress, Ian Millhiser has mini-profiles of some of the president’s possible nominees, while Jen Kirby does the same for New York. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Adler, New York University School of Law: Why transformativeness has proved so disastrous in the realm of contemporary art, even though hailed as a savior elsewhere. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:40 pm
The New York Times carries more on the president’s announcement as well as a roundup of reactions to the measures. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
The New York State Supreme Court Justice hearing the case concluded that the painting had not been abandoned because it did not constitute “a voluntary relinquishment of a known right. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York . . . granted Bernardin's motion to dismiss, holding that Sewell's claims were time-barred under the CFAA's and SCA's applicable two-year statutes of limitations. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
See New York Times v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:10 pm
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
See New York Times v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:48 pm
From New York! [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
The New York Times reports that the “[p]arliament attack was an embarrassment to the [Afghan] government. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am
John and Jane Does, the Second Circuit next addressed the case of Matthews v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am
John and Jane Does, the Second Circuit next addressed the case of Matthews v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 1:51 pm
,United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 10:10 am
The case is Jane Doe v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:38 am
Every few years, someone sues the State of New York over the bridge and highway tolls, which sometimes charge motorists different amounts of money depending on where you live. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
It’s a Southern District of New York case from 1999. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:21 am
Supreme Court decided Whitfield v. [read post]
