Search for: "Jessica Silbey"
Results 141 - 160
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
Jessica Silbey, IP and Constitutional Equality Progress Clause: one part of project comes from qualitative/empirical data, about what people working in creative industries think progress is. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
Football pundit Gary Lineker has returned to live presenting of the BBC’s football coverage after a temporary suspension while he was investigated for breaching impartiality rules. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
. * Jessica Silbey, Parody and Fair Markets, JOTWELL (October 13, 2015) (reviewing Kris Erickson, Martin Kretschmer, and Dinusha Mendis, Copyright and the Economic Effects of Parody: An Empirical Study of Music Videos on the YouTube Platform and an Assessment of the Regulatory Options (2013)). * AdWeek: Why The Beatles Needed Digital Streaming to Maintain Their Brand. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 7:13 am
The First Circuit rejected the scheme, and Jessica Silbey and I excoriated the case in our Copyright’s Memory Hole paper. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:41 am
recognition by this Supreme Court that first sales in foreign countries exhaust U.S. patent rights would not affect patents granted outside the United States. [15-1189_amicus_pet_abbott] Finally, Stanford’s IP Clinic filed a law professor’s brief signed by Mark Lemley, Dan Burk, Sam Ernst, Shubha Ghosh, Orly Lobel, Pamela Samuelson, Jessica Silbey, and others that explains: A clear exhaustion rule promotes the alienability of patented articles and reduces… [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Recent work by Jessica Silbey and others also shows that even in supposedly “high-IP” spaces, the actual process of creating and monetizing copyrightable works and patentable inventions relies much more on intrinsic motivations, attribution, and behavioral norms than on law. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
Session 2: The Product Market DimensionRobert Burrell: why do we treat territorial and product markets so differently? [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Stacey Dogan & Jessica Silbey: Jack Daniels & the False Promise of Trademark Use. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Jessica Silbey: same work in different uses will sometimes be fair and sometimes not? [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:02 pm
Jessica Silbey: Sidestepping incentive talk and focusing on the way that © affects us all; notice doesn’t necessarily work for us but on us. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:20 am
Jessica Silbey, Suffolk University Law School (United States) Law on the books and law in action can have huge disconnects. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 2:03 pm
[Jessica Silbey, for good reason, will hate the implicit definition of “empirical” at work here as “quantitative. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
IP Conversations: Trademark Law’s Fundamental Purposes, Boston University School of Law The debate over normative foundations: Mark McKenna: up until the 1920s-40s, courts uniformly understood that unfair competition was about trade diversion, illegitimately getting business that should have gone to someone else. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:35 pm
Jessica Silbey: tracing everyday practices through evidentiary fragments is great. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
Jessica Silbey, An Empirical Study of the Copyright De Minimus Defense How has it evolved? [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 12:49 pm
Stefania Fusco (co-author Valerio Sterzi), Does the EU Need an EBay-Like Case? [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:46 am
Jessica Silbey: Consider whether Tasini expansion of author rights led to more or less dis-integration. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:07 pm
Jessica Silbey, Section 102(b) and the Fact Exclusion Genealogy in U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:09 am
Mark McKenna & Jessica Silbey, Investigating Design: An Empirical Study of Industrial Design and IP ProtectionInterviews & institutional analysis. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:24 am
Especially given the evidence about how most (non-pharma) firms don’t make internal distinctions b/t IP doctrines (see also Jessica Silbey’s work), it’s hard for me to understand how one would distinguish between “existence of some basic TM right” and “this particular aspect of the doctrine” in performing the economic analysis of a doctrine’s incentive effects.]Q: this is about what TMs do to compete/bring a product to market,… [read post]
