Search for: "John Doe(s) #12 - 26" Results 141 - 160 of 1,355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2012, 1:50 pm by WIMS
level radioactive waste [See WIMS 1/26/12], House and Senate Committees announced plans to hold hearings on the recommendations. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:42 pm
In 2004 general election, African Americans comprised 26% of the North Carolina electorate, and John Kerry carried them by 85-14. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Sept. 12, 2006) (Order).........................15Tr. of Test. of John Doe No.1, Taylor v.Crawford, No. 05-4173 (W.D. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:51 am by Jim Sedor
Four years ago, such groups spent $50 million and made up only 12 percent of spending. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:41 pm by Jim Gerl
        Doe ex rel Doe v East Lyme Bd of Educ 790 F.3d 440, 65 IDELR 255 (Second Cir 6/26/15) Parent argued that SD violated stay put by failing to provide the related servicesof speech therapy and OT. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:18 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
15 May 2016, 3:04 pm by Nate Nead
The following post comes to us from Tim Truebenbach and John Lee of Morgan Stanley’s financial advisory practice. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Just because a company uses an alternative method to go public does not mean that its investors are any less deserving of time-tested investor protections. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 7:26 am by Brian C. Kalt
The majority group of 26 left themselves no such room. [read post]
So does this mean that the Refugee Convention demands surrogate protection for an applicant in circumstances where the state of origin has not actually violated a human right? [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:54 pm
McCain's statement will likely be remembered the same way we remember John Kerry's "I was for it before I was against it" moment in the 2004 election. [read post]