Search for: "John Doe-1" Results 141 - 160 of 14,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2010, 8:22 pm by Ron Coleman
Republished by Old Post PromoterThe defendant-appellant, John Doe No.1, anonymously posted allegedly defamatory statements about the plaintiff-appellee, Cahill, on an internet blog. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 7:21 am
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3, John Does 4-10, Ustream TV Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Does 1-16, the RIAA has filed its Appellees' Brief in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.The "John Doe" proceeding in the court below has been stayed pending the determination of the appeal.Appellees' Brief*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal… [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:43 am
Does 1-33, the RIAA's attempt to obtain the identities of students at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, "John Doe #28", a student at the University, has made a motion to quash the subpoena which has been served.According to the News Sentinel, this is the first attempt to attack the challenge to the RIAA's discovery proceedings in Knoxville.Knoxville News Sentinel articleLitigation documents:Motion to Quash*Memorandum of Law in Support of… [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:03 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-16, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed the orders of the lower court denying a motion to quash.The appeals court held that the order was appealable, but rejected John Doe #3's arguments that :-the district court was without authority to refer the motion to the Magistrate Judge;-the complaint failed to state a claim for copyright infringement; -the "fair use" defense barred plaintiffs' case; and-the papers… [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:42 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-13, a subpoena addressed to Verizon, calling for the identities and addresses of John Doe defendants, was returnable May 12th.On May 10th the Court stayed enforcement of the subpoena, and directed plaintiff's counsel to immediately notify Verizon of the stay.Unfortunately, as it turns out, Verizon had responded to the subpoena FIVE (5) DAYS BEFORE THE SUBPOENA'S RETURN DATE, on May 7th.Plaintiff's "motion for clarification"[Ed.… [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 4:21 pm
Does 1-4, after the university advised the Court that it could not identify John Does #8, 9, and 14 to a reasonable degree of technical certainty, Judge Nancy Gertner deemed the letter a motion to quash, and granted it, quashing the subpoena as to those defendants:The Court treats Boston University's 9/23/08 Letter as a Motion to Quash and GRANTS the motion with respect to Doe Defendants # 8, 9, and 14. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:23 am by Marty Schwimmer
The now searchable  list of defendants in an infringement action brought by Burberry (SDNY 1:12-cv-00479-TPG) (complaint not on ECF) John Doe 1 QIAO RENFENG A/KA QIU YANYANG AIKIA LIN RUI A/K/A CHEN DERONG A/K/ A XUE BINXUAN A/K/A YONGBO LI A/KIA XIAO JINGJING A/KIA JIANG AI A/KIA XUZHEYE XUZHEYE A/KIA XU ZHEYE A/KIA ZHOUMINMIN AIKIA ZHAO LI AIKIA ZHENG LINTIAN A/K/A LINTIAN ZHENG AIKIA John Doe 2 A/K/A LIUQING WU A/K/A WU LIUQI G… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:23 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0460, 2012 MT 201, MONTANA CANNABIS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, MARK MATTHEWS, SHIRLEY HAMP, SHELLY YEAGER, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, MICHAEL GECI-BLACK, M.D., JOHN STOWERS, M.D., POINT HATFIELD, and CHARLIE HAMP, Plaintiffs, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants, v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:06 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
From The Orlando Sentinel, via the NACDL's News of Interest: On May 19, Officer John Doe 1 killed a suspect who charged at him with a knife. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:24 am
For what it's worth, although John gets the big picture of the MCA right, there are several inaccurate statements in John's Op/Ed, including these: 1. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 10:27 am
Seven (7) North Carolina State University students named as "John Does" have joined together, in LaFace v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 8:42 am
CSPAN covering it live here.I'm out of town and don't have time just now to blog in detail about this statement, except for a handful of very quick reactions:1. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:38 pm
So understood, the John Doe proceeding does not fit into any of the categories for Younger abstention. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 4:46 pm
Does 1-9, a Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, case targeting Carnegie Mellon students, in which a student -- appearing pro se -- succeeded in challenging the misjoinder of John Does, but failed to get dismissal of the complaint or quashing of the subpoena, the Magistrate Judge's ruling has now been affirmed by the District Court Judge.The appeal has been pending for approximately one year.November 28, 2008, Order Affirming Rulings of Magistrate Judge*-->*… [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
 John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]