Search for: "Jonathan Bernstein" Results 141 - 160 of 249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2013, 8:40 am by Ilya Somin
It includes contributions on a variety of aspects of the case by numerous legal scholars and commentators on both sides of the issue, including the VC-ers Randy Barnett, Jonathan Adler, and myself. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
30 May 2013, 10:00 am by Ronald Collins
 The contributors are Orin Kerr, Randy Barnett, David Bernstein, Ilya Somin, Jonathan Adler, and David Kopel; Paul Clement wrote the foreword. [read post]
7 May 2013, 11:59 am by Ritika Singh
 Lastly, Jonathan Bernstein of the Plum Line expresses his frustration with Washington on this whole issue. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am by Conor McEvily
” Briefly: At the Washington Post’s “Post Partisan” blog, Jonathan Bernstein looks ahead to what the next Supreme Court nomination might look like in the Senate. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Fred von Lohmann: the first case recognizing code as speech was Bernstein v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am by Allison Trzop
  At Bench Memos, Jonathan H. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
Salon’s Jonathan Bernstein argues that the battle over Chuck Hagel’s confirmation is in fact a “dry run” for the coming fight over the next nominee to the Court. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
 And, as discussed in a prior post (here) in April 2012, former Simpson Thacher partner Michael Chepiga and former Bernstein Litowitz Partner Sean Coffey announced the formation of Black Robe Capital Partners, as yet another firm formed for purposed of litigation funding investment. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 9:11 pm by CAPTAIN
  Judge Scott Bernstein was considering a challenge, but chose not to run. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 6:52 pm by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) As Jonathan and Ilya have recently pointed out, Reason Magazine’s writers are overwhelmingly voting for Gary Johnson, or they are not voting at all. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Why historian Jonathan Rees assembles his own materials for his U.S. history survey course. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Buchanan Dorf on Law George Washington M Orin Kerr Volokh Conspiracy George Washington M Jonathan Turley Jonathan Turley George Washington M Donald C. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am by Rob Robinson
Goan – http://bit.ly/OkMJum (Venkat Balasubramani) Factual Material Considered by Expert Is Discoverable Despite Expert Witness Amendments - http://bit.ly/LuCGRb (Gregory Joseph) Failure to Issue a Written Litigation Hold Not Necessarily Fatal - http://bit.ly/LKUv36 (Thomas Tobin) Five Guidelines for Completing the Best Document Review Project – http://bit.ly/PA7xAZ (Jonathan Easton) Google’s Privilege Claim: A Cautionary Tale… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  Jonathan Adler performs another post mortem at the same blog, focusing on instances where Justice Robert has previously upheld statutes against constitutional challenge by adopting a strained “saving construction” of the legislative language. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  Jonathan Adler performs another post mortem at the same blog, focusing on instances where Justice Robert has previously upheld statutes against constitutional challenge by adopting a strained “saving construction” of the legislative language. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:49 am by Frank Pasquale
Here’s a really brief summary, excerpted from Jonathan Bernstein: 1. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm by Dan Filler
Mike Dorf here Jonathan Adler here Tim Jost here Randy Barnett here Larry Solum here, here, here, and here Richard Epstein here David Bernstein here Laurence Tribe here Adam Winkler here Nicole Huberfeld here Rick Hills here Howard Wasserman here Alan Morrison here Tom Smith here Rick Hasen here [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:51 pm by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) With regard to Jonathan’s post on Justice Scalia’s harsh words for Wickard, I’m not really surprised. [read post]