Search for: "Jones v. England"
Results 141 - 160
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
In England the position is clear: Google is not a publisher. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
Sabo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
So for instance, in the 2008 FAPL v QC Leisure litigation it was held that inclusion of the Premier League anthem was not essential for the purpose of showing the player line-up.... compulsive twitterer by nightWould, say, the tweeting of film extracts from football matches' topical moments qualify as news reporting? [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
The court stated in its judgment that DMG relied in particular on Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75.In Jameel Lord Phillips MR stated [at 54]:“An abuse of process is of concern not merely to the parties but to the court. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’ This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm
This also means that for these tenancies cases such as Church Commissioners v Meya, Macdonald v Fernandez, and Lower St Properties v Jones are also all irrelevant as they all deal with aspects of s21(4)(a) notices. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm
This also means that for these tenancies cases such as Church Commissioners v Meya, Macdonald v Fernandez, and Lower St Properties v Jones are also all irrelevant as they all deal with aspects of s21(4)(a) notices. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:34 pm
One of the significant common features of Grosse v Purvis, Doe v ABC and Doe v Yahoo! [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
Two differently constituted Courts of Appeal for England and Wales, within a very short period, appear to have come up with quite different approaches to how to treat an appeal in which they take issue with the trial judge's findings of fact, one case being Lumos and the other being Okotoks v Fine & Country (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:55 am
Perry, Jeff Merkley, Jones Day, Law Schools, Layoffs, Media and Journalism, Nelson Mandela, New England Patriots, Pam Karlan, SCOTUS, Shelby County, Sports, Stanford Law School, Supreme Court, Tim Tebow, Tom Brady, Trayvon Martin, University of Maryland School of Law, Weil Gotshal, Wendy Davis, Windsor v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
* Mistrial (due to jury deadlock) declared in Jones v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
In Vernon Kay v Reveal, the television and radio presenter Vernon Kay complained through his representatives, Hackford Jones, about the accuracy of an article headlined “Vernon’s still walking on eggshells“, published in Reveal magazine in July 2013. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:39 am
The case is Cole v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:50 pm
A discussion of the case of Jones –v- Jones, which involved the treatment by the Court of Appeal of a business which began before the marriage but significantly increased in value during it. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 1:36 am
Jones v Lipman, Trustor and other cases were similarly explained. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:04 pm
The NSW Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Lloyd-Jones v Allen ([2012] NSWCA 230) on 1 August 2012. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:06 am
Swedish rape would not be rape in England. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:23 am
It was perfectly possible to use a formula, so long as the final date is sufficiently clear that it can be ascertained by the tenant, see, by way of comparison, Lower Street Properties v Jones [1996] 2 EGLR 67. [read post]
