Search for: "Jones v. Foote" Results 141 - 160 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 7:54 am by Susan Brenner
Jones, 308 F.3d 748 (2002), the U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am by Alicia Maule
Ritchie and Kay Whitlock Race and the Death Penalty: The Legacy of “McCleskey v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Canada Mondawq News had a piece “A $750,000 Foot Long: Costs Awarded To CBC In Failed Subway Defamation Suit”. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
  "[V]ery bad…for the law firms that pay them, for the associates who receive them, for the clients who foot the bill for them, and for the society we serve. . . the higher salaries are wasted dollars. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
 At the Washington Post, Michael Shear and Robert Barnes report on Kagan’s comments on Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 5:55 pm
For example, Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones is in the final stages of completing the new $1.1 billion Cowboys stadium. [5] With a standard 80,000 seats that can be expanded to 100,000, and an additional 300 suites, the revenue from ticket prices will only be the beginning for Jones. [6] The most expensive seats in the new stadium are expected to go for approximately $340 a game. [7] Naming rights for the new stadium will likely yield an unprecedented amount, and various… [read post]
COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-07-00428-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-17-09, pet denied Oct 2009)(disbarment affirmed, affirmative defense of limitations waived by failure to plead it,trial amendment denied as prejudicial)09-0682 ROY JONES v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by DaytonDUI
”  This flirts with overturning the 1984 Ohio Supreme Court ruling in State v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:04 pm
[For those wish to the long-form legal argument, the Pacific Legal Foundation briefs in Sissel v. [read post]