Search for: "Jones v. Office of the State Public Defenders"
Results 141 - 160
of 738
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
Monroe County, the Supreme Court held that Alabama sheriff-defendants represented the state as a whole, not their individual counties, when executing their law enforcement duties. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
In August 2019, Jones was attacked outside a London pub while celebrating his birthday. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm
Circuit held in Jones v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
Expanding the Internet of Things: Four Key Legal IssuesOctober 2020 By David Verhey Verhey is Partner with Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig in Washington DC office. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
This case presents no more than the ordinary burdens any foreign defendant will bear when called to defend an action in the United States against a domestic plaintiff. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
Motherwell v Motherwell ((1976) 73 DLR (3d) 62) and Wainwright v Home Office ([2004] 2 AC 406) expressly contemplated nuisance’s application to privacy. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 8:35 am
The complaint names as defendants the company itself as well as certain of its directors and officers. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Jones v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm
The case involved allegations in relation “to conduct in public office”, and this was the differentiating factor from case law opened in court last week – and the defendant too had written a robust defence letter early “pleading public interest”, the judge said. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
The claimant alleged the defendant was blackmailing him after they met in secret on a dating website. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:51 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
Defenders of Wildlife (1992)).Like members of the public, members of Congress, too, have a “public interest in proper administration of the laws,” Lujan, but that interest isn’t any different from the “generalized interest of all citizens in constitutional governance”--an interest that’s insufficient to support Article III standing when the Executive is alleged to have acted unlawfully, or ultra vires. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Trump v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
The committee intervened in place of the individual defendants and agreed to stay the subpoena until the district court ruled. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
The EUIPO Board of Appeal refused it, but on the basis that the mark was “contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality”. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
State Street Corporation, U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
Jones, 952 F.3d 153 (March 3, 2020). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:49 am
State v. [read post]
