Search for: "Jones v. State of California"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2016, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
Here's what that bill says: "LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST/AB 927, Jones-Sawyer. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:05 pm
UOP and Charles Jones & Associates v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its highly-anticipated ruling in United States v. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
But California is one of numerous states whose judiciaries’ subject matter jurisdiction does not depend on standing. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:37 am
State of California In-Home Supportive Services v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:32 am
By Nathan Jones and Leslie Z. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:42 pm
One such question came in California v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:31 pm
Sit downToday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal heard oral argument in the case of Jones v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Before Goodridge v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
The United States Department of Agriculture issued an inspection certificate for the rice and corn in Woodland, California. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
In 1913, California was one of the first States to prohibit the sale and possession of marijuana, and at the end of the century, California became the first State to authorize limited use of the drug for medicinal purposes. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465, 473-74 (2007).Few state court judgments can withstand even one such error, see, e.g., Jones v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
In California Democratic Party v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
In a 2008 case, Jones v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:00 am
Jones, 2013 U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:14 am
On Tuesday, the Court will hear arguments in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]