Search for: "KENNEDY V AIR FORCE"
Results 141 - 160
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2009, 9:58 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:58 pm
She agrees with her interviewer that Justice Kennedy's reference to regret in Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:22 pm
See Kennedy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:59 pm
In Meshwerks v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:38 am
In any event, it's a nice breath of dark fresh air. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 8:56 am
I won't say how many call him an Air Force civilian lawyer rather than a Colonel in the Marine Corps Reserves. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:13 pm
An Air Force Board of Review affirmed all three death sentences. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
This ban was enshrined in Schedule 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 as amended by the Representation of the People Act 1985:3 Disfranchisement of offenders in prison etc(1) A convicted person during the time that he is detained in a penal institution in pursuance of his sentence [or unlawfully at large when he would otherwise be so detained] is legally incapable of voting at any parliamentary or local government election.(2) For this purpose -(a) "convicted person" means any… [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:35 pm
A civilian Air Force lawyer, Dwight Sullivan, mentioned the omission over the weekend on his military law blog. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
Apparently the only person who knew anything about it was ... a lowly blogger, civilian Air Force lawyer Dwight Sullivan ! [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
Apparently the only person who knew anything about it was ... a lowly blogger, civilian Air Force lawyer Dwight Sullivan! [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 12:10 pm
Dwight Sullivan, a civilian appellate defense counsel in the Air Force Appellate Defense Division, noticed the omission. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 7:39 pm
Relying upon a post-World War II decision by the Supreme Court (Hirota v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:42 pm
The decision, in a case involving an Air Force major's suspension from duty because of her sexual relationship with another woman, is a fascinating read for any number of reasons, but I'll just flag a couple for now. [read post]
16 May 2008, 3:29 pm
NMCCA also noted that the Air Force Court has "recognized an exception to Rule 707's general exclusion when polygraph evidence is sought to be admitted by the prosecution to rebut an appellant's challenge to 'the voluntariness of his admissions to the investigators.'" Id. at 9 (quoting United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:01 pm
Bobby Kennedy. [read post]
