Search for: "KERR v. SMITH"
Results 141 - 160
of 205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
Jones and Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
In the Privy Council Samuel Robie v The Queen (Jamaica) will be heard on Tuesday 8 November by Lords Kerr, Clarke and Wilson, Dame Heather Hallett and Dame Janet Smith. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am
This blog’s Lyle Denniston and the New Orleans Times-Picayune preview tomorrow’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The most apparent beneficiary of this willingness of the Courts to expand the scope of such relief would appear to be common law spouses (see the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Kerr v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:24 am
Smith v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
(Orin Kerr) This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
The recent Supreme Court of Canada case of Kerr v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:27 am
Kerr, Four Models of Fourth Amendment Protection, 60 Stan. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:31 pm
(Orin Kerr) Thanks to Lyle Denniston, I learned today that the Justice Department has just filed its brief in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 8:31 pm
Most fundamentally, I don’t think location information of phones is protected by the Fourth Amendment under Smith v.... [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 pm
Most fundamentally, I don’t think location information of phones is protected by the Fourth Amendment under Smith v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
On Wednesday 20 July 2011, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R v Smith which was heard on 16 June 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
R v Smith, heard 16 June 2011. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
R v Smith, heard 16 June 2011. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) The rare opportunity arose in American Fork City v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
R v Smith, heard 16 June 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
R v Smith, heard 16 June 2011. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:41 am
United States, Smith v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
In Courtroom 2, on Thursday 16 June 2011, the case of R v Smith will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins and Lord Wilson. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Dyson and Brown also agreed that the inquest into the McCaughey and Grew deaths was required by the HRA, interpreted in the light of Silih, to be Article 2 compliant, the latter pointing out ([102]) that “[t]here are, we were told, 16 existing “legacy inquests” (involving 26 deaths) currently outstanding on the coroner’s books, a further six incidents (involving eight pre-2000 deaths) referred by the Attorney General to the Coroner for… [read post]
