Search for: "KNOTT v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2012, 11:05 am by Orin Kerr
This ruling is in in significant tension with United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:26 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Washington, DC lawyer Scott Knott of The Ferraro Law Firm on their firm's Tax Whistleblower Report Understanding VC Financings - Transaction Costs and Attorney Fees - Seattle lawyer Asher Bearman of DLA Piper on The Venture Alley Little lies employers tell . . . and why they shouldn't - Winston-Salem attorney Robin Shea of Constangy on the firm's blog, Employment & Labor Insider New Energy Grants Help to Expand Alternative Fuel,… [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:06 am by Jay Stanley
But the Supreme Court has left open—in cases like US v Knotts and US v Jones—the argument that there’s a crucial distinction between happening to overhear something, and pervasive surveillance. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am by Giorgio Luceri
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen… [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
In re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
Weaver (involving a GPS device) from the facts of the most factually similar federal precedent, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:59 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) In its opinion below in what became United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by John Elwood
Manis, 15-1 Knotts v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am by John Elwood
Manis, 15-1 Knotts v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am by John Elwood
Manis, 15-1 Knotts v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:35 pm by Ryan Singel
The government argued that a 1983 Supreme Court case U.S. v. [read post]